When I speak of a proposed object moving from one edge of the universe to the other in a few seconds, I am speaking of a real object safely moving from one loctaion to another and arriving in tact.
I am speaking of real science. Not a theory.
Any object moving at any speed will take time to move from location to another, even if sensitibve instrumentation is required to calculate it's speed of travel.
If you do not have the object, and it is not moving, and has no direction, you do not have a theory or any science.
If you are talking about any object that moves, regardless of speed you are an idiot to say it took any longer than it took for that object to cross that space.
There are no transitions between real and unreal travel, there are only different locations. Arriving at different location because you have super luminally moved to that location, does not equal time travel.
It equals location travel and location you cannot avoid.
You Einstein minded people cannot avoid admitting you speak of a real object, and a real destination, and a real speed at which the object moved from said location to location....and you will concede it took time, because you have already admitted it was an object, it moved, from here to there, and did it this fast.
You will be seen as the village idiot when you argue these facts in a scientific setting....so so lets get our cards out on the table, and see who has the best hand...I bet Nuimshaan wins.