Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Doesn't the distance of stars disprove the young earth theory?
TribulationMMA
Junior Member (Idle past 4902 days)
Posts: 1
Joined: 11-24-2010


Message 121 of 138 (593083)
11-24-2010 7:02 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by cavediver
08-22-2010 5:16 AM


Re: Hubble
Before i post anything i just want to let everyone know. This is my first post.
With the Big Bang theory, when all the matter first exploded, it would have to obviously be very close to each other. Now with the stars being relatively close to each other at one point the light given from any certain star could have been seen from any planet or star. In the Big Bang did the matter travel faster than the speed of light to where we cannot see the stars now? If the stars/planets did move faster than the speed of light then how are we seeing any stars or other planets now, because they would still be moving that quickly.
Just a disclaimer while reading this forum I just wondered if that was possible or not? This could have already been explained and if so I apologize.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by cavediver, posted 08-22-2010 5:16 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by cavediver, posted 11-24-2010 7:30 AM TribulationMMA has not replied
 Message 123 by Larni, posted 11-24-2010 10:31 AM TribulationMMA has not replied
 Message 128 by NoNukes, posted 11-25-2010 3:09 PM TribulationMMA has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024