|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Living According to Christ: Is it Reasonable? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
I would like to discuss the teachings of the New Testament that instruct us on how to live. The specific question up for debate will be: given the difference between the mindset with which they were issued and the mindset with which we read them today, are such instructions reasonable and/or relevant in our present age?
The New Testament presents a lot of teachings telling people how to live and how to behave. These how to live teachings often ask that individuals disregard their earthly wealth and worries to live a life in devotion of Christ and God. But, of course, Jesus preached, and Paul believed, that the world was soon to end. And it appears that many of Jesus', and Paul's, how to live teachings seem specifically tied to this belief:
quote: quote: quote: quote: It is now 2000 years since these things were conceived, and the mindset with which they were conceived is no longer a part of mainstream Christianity. These teachings were given under the belief that the end times were soon to come; that our earthly lives should not be given so much attention; that all who believed would soon be taken care of. This is not the mindset of today. Most do not count on a coming kingdom for their immediate needs, and live each day for the benefit of the next. In fact, many of these teachings have taken on a different importance in our present day: it is not that we give to rid ourselves, so we now believe, but rather to provide for others. But such an interpretation only addresses a small aspect of the teaching, and anyone living by such an interpretation is clearly failing to fulfill the teaching to the utmost. We are to rid ourselves of all earthly concerns, so these teachings say, and devote our life to Christ and God. Few live to this standard. So, for this thread I would like to discuss these teachings of the New Testament that instruct us on how to livethe teachings that all seem based in the belief that the world will soon end. Given the difference between the mindset with which they were issued and the mindset with which we read them today, are such instructions reasonable and/or relevant in our present age? In the 21st Century, is it reasonable to live like Christ commanded? If it seemed reasonable then but not so much anymore, how do we reconcile this with what is written? Jon Edited by Jon, : Subtitle; edit to fix signature Edited by Jon, : readability Edited by Jon, : Removed message to Admins... Edited by Jon, : Bible links more precise Edited by Jon, : Jeesh... I made a mess... Check out Apollo's Temple!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AdminPD Inactive Administrator |
Thread copied here from the Living According to Christ: Is it Reasonable? thread in the Proposed New Topics forum.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
frako Member Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: |
Im guessing since no one lives by those words it is very unreasnoble, if all or at leat the majorety would follow them it would not be hard.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 809 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Jon writes:
I think you have that fundamentally wrong. I don't think Jesus taught an "end times" message at all but an all-times message. He was echoing The Preacher:
So, for this thread I would like to discuss these teachings of the New Testament that instruct us on how to livethe teachings that all seem based in the belief that the world will soon end. quote:De-emphasizing material gain is about making a better (more Jewish) society. Give what you have and when you need it, somebody will give it back. Keep what you have and you're on your own. "It appears that many of you turn to Hebrew to escape the English...." -- Joseppi
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member Posts: 16113 Joined: |
In the 21st Century, is it reasonable to live like Christ commanded? Yes --- because the world is still just about to end. And it always will be.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
iano Member (Idle past 2338 days) Posts: 6165 From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland. Joined: |
Jon writes: But, of course, Jesus preached, and Paul believed, that the world was soon to end. And it appears that many of Jesus', and Paul's, how to live teachings seem specifically tied to this belief It seems you want to narrow the relevance of Christs teachings to this narrow timescale: the idea of a soon-to-end world. However, Christians in the main don't intepret the Bible to be teaching that to believers either then or now.
Most do not count on a coming kingdom for their immediate needs, and live each day for the benefit of the next. The declaration for then and for now (it would appear) is that the Kingdom of God is at hand (ie: under your nose). It was access to the this kingdom-now-and-within which was intended to be the source of sustenance of man, not his forward looking to some future kingdom come. I would agree that both then and now, Christians are guilty of misdirecting their gaze. Hence the repeated exhortations about where it is we are to look.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Queue Junior Member (Idle past 4813 days) Posts: 5 From: Ottawa, Canada Joined: |
quote:Problem: You begin by asking if the instructions of Jesus are reasonable in the present day, but then narrow the field significantly, and - I would suggest - entirely in the wrong direction. The most impressive argument comes from looking at the infamous Luke 14:26, which has been explained as tantamount to placing religious conviction above duty to self, family, and others. This (along with subsequent suggestions that what people do is irrelevant compared to how strongly they believe) is a far less encouraging model for a world as massively connected via communications and trade as ours is, since it can be used to justify all kinds of behaviour. As an aside, Jesus differs strongly from the OT God largely as he delivers instructions via parable and inference rather than strict legalism, which leaves for a huge margin of personal interpretation. I feel this shows Jesus' model to be too flexible; I suspect this is why Paul is taken so seriously, since his more legalistic approach closes a lot of gaps. Edited by Queue, : Paragraph spacing fix.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
The most impressive argument comes from looking at the infamous Luke 14:26 quote: Clearly this was not approved by all early Christians, as can be seen by the more softened version in Matthew:
quote: which has been explained as tantamount to placing religious conviction above duty to self, family, and others. I don't think you can make such a soft generalized argument given the passage in Luke; the argument that the purpose is to place religious conviction above life and family is better supported by the passage in Matthew I cited above. The passage in Luke is much more drastic than this and requires a much more drastic interpretation, or, alternatively, a simple denial of the reality of what is written.
Problem: You begin by asking if the instructions of Jesus are reasonable in the present day, but then narrow the field significantly, and - I would suggest - entirely in the wrong direction. I am not sure why you feel I have taken my thread in the 'wrong' direction. The purpose of narrowing the topic down was to focus on only those instructions that may seem unreasonable given the present age. There are certainly many other instructions Jesus and his followers gave for living life, but few of them would cause any trouble for modern Christians were they to follow them in the fullest. Those may be interesting in a thread on their own, but this thread is meant to be about the problematic instructions specifically. Jon Check out Apollo's Temple!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18763 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 2.9 |
Jon writes: I would like to discuss the teachings of the New Testament that instruct us on how to live. The specific question up for debate will be: given the difference between the mindset with which they were issued and the mindset with which we read them today, are such instructions reasonable and/or relevant in our present age? The New Testament presents a lot of teachings telling people how to live and how to behave. These how to live teachings often ask that individuals disregard their earthly wealth and worries to live a life in devotion of Christ and God. But, of course, Jesus preached, and Paul believed, that the world was soon to end. And it appears that many of Jesus', and Paul's, how to live teachings seem specifically tied to this belief: Several observations and Phats infamous 2 cents: 1) People have always believed that the world is going to end. Reality seems to suggest that at certain times in history, a certain culture and/or lifestyle did in fact end. Some of us modern day Christians will use the Bible to explain why our jobs are all going overseas, for example...or why immigration is a problem. We seem to equate Patriotism and American exclusivity with our divine right to be people of the book. But that's a bit off topic.......
Jon writes: This is not the mindset of today. Most do not count on a coming kingdom for their immediate needs, and live each day for the benefit of the next. In fact, many of these teachings have taken on a different importance in our present day: it is not that we give to rid ourselves, so we now believe, but rather to provide for others. But such an interpretation only addresses a small aspect of the teaching, and anyone living by such an interpretation is clearly failing to fulfill the teaching to the utmost. We are to rid ourselves of all earthly concerns, so these teachings say, and devote our life to Christ and God. Few live to this standard. Ridding myself of all earthly concerns in a symbolic sense is comforting. Ridding myself of these concerns in a practical sense is silly, however. If a man does not work, he will not eat nor be able to pay rent.
Jon writes: So, for this thread I would like to discuss these teachings of the New Testament that instruct us on how to live...In the 21st Century, is it reasonable to live like Christ commanded? If it seemed reasonable then but not so much anymore, how do we reconcile this with what is written? Jar has already talked of this stuff. He basically says that we humans were given a great gift to know right from wrong, that we are charged to do right...treat the least of our brothers with respect and love, and sacrifice our own comforts, if necessary, in order to do so. How far should one carry it? To literally give evrything up for Jesus is logically irresponsible. How is Jesus gonna pay my rent? Edited by Phat, : fixed slanderous comment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Queue Junior Member (Idle past 4813 days) Posts: 5 From: Ottawa, Canada Joined: |
quote:Oh, I agree; "Hate" is strong and specific. I'm making a concession to Blueletter Bible's apologetics in this case. I didn't have to, but I can make my point even on the pillow-down interpretation of the passage. quote:Well, leaving aside everything else, Jesus' model fails to provide reasonable guidelines for even what modern morality cites as proper family values. It's a crack at the very bottom of the pyramid - living life according to Mathew 12:46-49 (my followers are my family, so I'll ignore my actual family) and 10:37 (love me more than your family) could encourage a lifestyle that even a moderate modern Christian might negatively associate with a cult.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 236 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: To literally give evrything up for Jesus is logically irresponsible. How is Jesus gonna pay my rent? False Dilemma alert? Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
It is apparent that there can be much debated on the topic of whether or not Jesus' messageand indeed, his entire beliefwas apocalyptic. Excerpts from the earlier writings contained in the New Testament seem to indicate that he felt the end to be near:
quote: quote: And even the early followers apparently felt likewise:
quote: Yet, similar ideas expressed in later writings soften, or omit these references to the coming end, and occasionally contradict them:
quote: quote: quote: quote: Given this, it seems in the earliest days Christianity was an apocalyptic cult: the founder preached it; the followers believed it. It was only later, when the end began to appear more distant than first thought, that the religion ditched the apocalyptic message. We can see this in the gradual softening of the language used to reference the 'Second Coming'. In Mark, Jesus specifically states that his own disciples will not die before 'the Kingdom of God has come with power'; in Matthew, the references are softened. In one instance, the same passage from Mark is re-rendered to only state that the 'Son of Man' will come 'in his kingdom'. Jesus' mere presence fulfills this, as there is no longer any reference to the coming power of the Kingdom of God. Where the passages from Mark do not present as much trouble for Matthew, he leaves them unchanged; for example, it is much less specific to say that a generation will not pass away rather than to say that no members of a particular group of people will die. Paul expresses his belief that the end is near when he describes an 'impending crisis', and states that the 'present form of this world is passing away'. But even this seems shadowed in the reality of the daythat many Christians were dying before the promised return of Christ, as evidenced in, for example, I Thessalonians 4:13—18. As time marches, we see the situation worsen. Folk are no longer simply worried that the dead Christians will not get to see the kingdom, but are worried that the kingdom won't even come: II Peter 3:4. The only reassurance the author can give is to tell his audience that it could be thousands of years... talk about patience! All of this seems mismatched and shaky if we don't assume an apocalyptic origin to Christianity; the easiest way to fit everything together is to assume there was an initial feeling by Jesus (or so it is reported) and his followers of the imminence of the end. This belief was later abandoned; the beliefs of Jesus associated with it were softened, altered, reinterpreted (e.g., Luke) or left out in further accounts of his life; and later church teachings adjusted, when it became all too apparent that the Kingdom wasn't going to come any time soon. Interestingly, though, while references Jesus made to the end were not preserved in later gospels, some of his related advice was. The original relevance of this advice was tied to the belief that the world would soon end. The re-interpretation of this advice became a matter of great importance to Christianity as it coped with the inevitable failure of the predictions of its prophet. Anyway, that is a separate debate, and perhaps it would be more productive to go at this a different way. A couple questions for the Christians on the board: How do you interpret these instructions (the ones quoted so far)? When Jesus says to 'sell what you have, and give to the poor', and 'do not worry about tomorrow', how do you take his message? Jon Edited by Jon, : Schpelling... Edited by Jon, : missing words Edited by Jon, : more bad grammar Check out Apollo's Temple! Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
If a man does not work But, of course, there are no instructions to not work. So where are you drawing this from? Jon Check out Apollo's Temple!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 236 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Jon writes: A couple questions for the Christians on the board: How do you interpret these instructions (the ones quoted so far)? When Jesus says to 'sell what you have, and give to the poor', and 'do not worry about tomorrow', how do you take his message? First, yes, the evidence shows that the early Christians were an apocalyptic cult that did expect an end, but not "the end of the world" type but rather a revolution. It's likely that at least during the period when the earlier texts that make up the new testament were written, the folk expected the revolution to come during their lifetime. As they grew older, both the timing and the very nature of the New World Order they imagined changed, first from being the rise of a New World Power that would be centered among the Jews in Jerusalem, to the over throw of Rome, then finally to some heavenly kingdom. The second question is one I have always taken to heart. Don't worry about tomorrow, prepare and see each new day as a challenge, a chance to start afresh, a new beginning. Use the resources you acquire wisely, not just for your comfort but hopefully to help others. Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jon Inactive Member |
It's a crack at the very bottom of the pyramid - living life according to Mathew 12:46-49 (my followers are my family, so I'll ignore my actual family) and 10:37 (love me more than your family) could encourage a lifestyle that even a moderate modern Christian might negatively associate with a cult. I disagree. I have met many die-hard Christians who claim to love Jesus more than anything or anyone else. Entire families appear to function under this mindset. Whether cult-ish or not, it is certainly not behavior unusual to the modern Christian.
I didn't have to, but I can make my point even on the pillow-down interpretation of the passage. I guess I wasn't certain what your argument was. Would you be able to offer a clarification? Jon Check out Apollo's Temple!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025