Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Playing God with Neanderthals
Taq
Member
Posts: 10085
Joined: 03-06-2009
Member Rating: 5.6


Message 143 of 144 (608191)
03-09-2011 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 142 by Peter
03-09-2011 9:04 AM


Re: Hypothetical Situation
Human trials happen that Do cause permanent injury and death though ... and all the pre-testing gives the subjects a false sense of security.
If the process of getting consent is done properly then no subject should have a false sense of security. Also, no drug is approved for clinical trials if there is a known side effect that does cause permanent injury or death compared to the current standard of treatment. When such side effects are observed in larger pools of subjects a trial is immediately halted.
There's also financial inducement in some of those trials (in the UK anyhow) -- which is probably just as much a way of skewing the informedness of the consent as being terminally ill.
That is a big no-no in the US. Subjects are paid for their time, but the pay is below levels that would be considered as an enticement. For our own trials we usually calculate around $12/hr for travel and time spent with the study coordinator. We are also careful in screening possible subjects to judge whether or not this small amount of reimbursement would sway their consent.
I do see the point though ...
I have had to sit through the training so it is nice to shovel this on someone else for a change.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by Peter, posted 03-09-2011 9:04 AM Peter has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024