Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9073 total)
498 online now:
AnswersInGenitals, Aussie, AZPaul3, dwise1, nwr, Phat, Tangle, Tanypteryx (8 members, 490 visitors)
Newest Member: MidwestPaul
Post Volume: Total: 893,306 Year: 4,418/6,534 Month: 632/900 Week: 156/182 Day: 36/27 Hour: 0/4

Announcements: Security Update Released


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   When Earth’s population was 10,000 persons
Percy
Member
Posts: 20766
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 160 of 194 (654896)
03-05-2012 11:53 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by goldenlightArchangel
03-05-2012 11:48 AM


Re: Beyond the thin red line – Population growth Model
CrazyDiamond7 writes:

Frako, Why not go straight to the point and bring up your population growth model, e.g.: from 50 thousand years ago until 21,000 years ago, in order for people to verify how accurate it is.

He did that in Message 154 - you haven't responded yet.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-05-2012 11:48 AM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 20766
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 166 of 194 (654916)
03-05-2012 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by goldenlightArchangel
03-05-2012 2:33 PM


Re: A question to all teachers on Human Origins
Hi CrazyDiamond7,

It almost sounds like you want to substitute a simplistic math equation for estimates that take into account climate, technology, agriculture, migration patterns, etc. A fixed math equation uninformed by what was actually going on in the real world at the time seems doomed to be inaccurate, even wildly so.

You've posted this same request a number of times, I don't think you're going to get a different answer, plus it's getting boring. If you respond to some of the objections you're getting maybe we could address what you think the problems are.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-05-2012 2:33 PM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 20766
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 178 of 194 (655295)
03-09-2012 8:13 AM
Reply to: Message 176 by goldenlightArchangel
03-08-2012 4:22 PM


Re: THE FINALS CAN BE CHANGED – and they still indicate global termination
Hi CrazyDiamond,

You say one of your sources is Evolution theory for the origin of the Human body, but the Internet has never heard of it. Can you provide a reference?

You say your other source is the Institute of Historical Research. Can you provide a link to where at their site you're getting this information?

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-08-2012 4:22 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by caffeine, posted 03-09-2012 8:25 AM Percy has replied
 Message 182 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-09-2012 5:16 PM Percy has seen this message

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 20766
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 180 of 194 (655302)
03-09-2012 8:36 AM
Reply to: Message 179 by caffeine
03-09-2012 8:25 AM


Re: THE FINALS CAN BE CHANGED – and they still indicate global termination
Is it possible that CrazyDiamond is combining bits and pieces of your information with his math-derived figures?

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by caffeine, posted 03-09-2012 8:25 AM caffeine has taken no action

  
Percy
Member
Posts: 20766
From: New Hampshire
Joined: 12-23-2000
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 186 of 194 (655701)
03-12-2012 6:46 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by goldenlightArchangel
03-12-2012 5:50 PM


Re: The Flood story only works as a parable. — Things are not as they seem to be
CrazyDiamond7 writes:

One might understand and verify that every population data from past years does show a multiplication rate...

But not a constant multiplication rate. From actual population data over time you can calculate the rate of population increase for any period, but different time periods will have different rates, and in the absence of population data you can only guestimate. Your population projections are based upon guesses rather than data and so have little or no value.

--Percy


This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-12-2012 5:50 PM goldenlightArchangel has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022