Any defense will be on religous grounds?- Hmmm
I thought I had a canned response ready for you c-e errs yesterday but on reading a little bit more in the AMBIGUOUS FROG and comparing to what Faraday actually said... if Darwin picked up BOTH the word "evolution" and "variation" from Farady or the then resolving issue of Voltanism in his time from a reading to The ROyal soCiety well then ID can indeed be defended scientifically without a lie for any fact. But right now I am investigating statements or assertions of historians and am not ready to comment on current science. For it appears that Newton's GOD and SPIRIT in the general Sholium was first drafted as IB Cohen brought out recently by a series of operations that if rigorously correlatable with cell death the in the gut of larval to adult tadpoles WILL NOT BE only the transmission of electrictity into the brain or sensorium as his suppressed eariler paragraphs had not led most teachers of science to read. Sure the information architeture of macrophage nutrition would be involved but this if true is not mere words that I felt DNA Union was throwing back at me. It will matter that chemsitry EVOLVES electricity MEANS what we take today as individual EvOlVes Species. Dennet had some sharp clade selection questions that could be algorthimically true and me not wrong. It would be great if evos could learn to not speak in this style of assertion "if is lies" etc. I like the snake but thePatriots may lose to the color of the Panther. I dont like the style as I said. Farady argued against a METAL ORDER and if all the evos are going to do is insist on elite nanotech then IT WILL BE CLEAR that instead of using my own family in comparing any tension in CE I CAN IN THE SAME SOCIALITY USE ICR's mission. I havent made this transition in thought yet if this is all that I find evos saying then It will likely occur involunatarily for me for I am too well read to be disuaded for from less of, in...Sorry for being wordy but what I had prepared is not just not good enough for me yet.
"we f0rmulated"- could you care to give your real name- are you Dick Lewontin- who are you really? if you care to CSS it?? Things could be discussed but communication must go two way street and not always be in the basin saint street rampart. Cohen simply thought that capilarity had nothing to do with electricity. I havent shown that Faraday actually thought this but his words may be able to speak this for themselves. F wrote a lot and I have not read all his work as Maxwell did.
™ Version 4.2
