Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Defence of Intelligent Design
bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 208 (79923)
01-21-2004 10:17 PM


I'm Bran,
I am writing a paper in defense of Intelligent design, along with all of my six other classes I don't have time to look through 200,000 google items so if anyone can point me to any good defense of ID. Any help is greatly appreciated. I am also a creationist and a bible believing christian and any insight from creationists is appreciated as well.
BRAN

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Cthulhu, posted 01-21-2004 10:23 PM bran_sept88 has replied
 Message 9 by sidelined, posted 01-22-2004 1:53 AM bran_sept88 has replied
 Message 13 by FliesOnly, posted 01-22-2004 1:12 PM bran_sept88 has replied
 Message 203 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 04-24-2004 5:43 PM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 208 (79929)
01-21-2004 10:39 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by Cthulhu
01-21-2004 10:23 PM


Thx
When i said good advise i meant it!
BRAN+0

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Cthulhu, posted 01-21-2004 10:23 PM Cthulhu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by NosyNed, posted 01-21-2004 10:59 PM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 7 by johnfolton, posted 01-22-2004 12:19 AM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 8 by Cthulhu, posted 01-22-2004 12:42 AM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 208 (80000)
01-22-2004 7:01 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by sidelined
01-22-2004 1:53 AM


Yes I do understand what ID means, from ireducible complexity to addaptational packages. While i do understand it i still am strugling to defend it at this time, due to a lack of good sources.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by sidelined, posted 01-22-2004 1:53 AM sidelined has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Darwin's Terrier, posted 01-22-2004 7:35 AM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 208 (80143)
01-22-2004 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by FliesOnly
01-22-2004 1:12 PM


Well were to begin, for starters you said nothing relating to the theory, you merely created a straw man and classified me as a religious fundamentalist rather than focusing on the arguments. In truth you have no concept of real science if you would like to give me food for thought than present real arguments based on science, instead of a bunch of crap about "oh it is obviously wrong", that's bull and completely unscientific. And for another thing those people are my friends and if you would like to bad mouth them then perhaps you can stop hiding behind you computer and tell me a place were you can meet me and tell me to my face. I understand fine science and the various theory's and would enjoy your scientific advise, if such a thing exists, and i will run my life and believe whatever i please and i don't need advise from someone who claims to be related to an ape.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by FliesOnly, posted 01-22-2004 1:12 PM FliesOnly has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by AdminAsgara, posted 01-22-2004 5:45 PM bran_sept88 has replied
 Message 34 by Loudmouth, posted 01-22-2004 6:12 PM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 35 by crashfrog, posted 01-22-2004 6:16 PM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 56 by FliesOnly, posted 01-23-2004 9:23 AM bran_sept88 has replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 208 (80167)
01-22-2004 6:49 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by AdminAsgara
01-22-2004 5:45 PM


I'm am sincerely sry. Bad day at school may explain it and I'm truly interested in learning and am sry i blew up and displayed a truly unchristian response and would like to admit that my response was wrong. Flies I'm am sry for my misrepresentation of my faith and would like to continue on congenial terms and continued to benefit from the many knowledgeable men on this site. As for the ape comment, while accusing of a straw man i committed one and am truly sry. Flies perhaps if we could stick to science fact and keep my friends and my christianity out of our discussion and treat me as merely as an advocate of ID. I want to learn what the truth is and am coming from it with that I mind, not my presuppositions.
With Sincere Apologies and In pursuit of truth.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by AdminAsgara, posted 01-22-2004 5:45 PM AdminAsgara has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by sidelined, posted 01-23-2004 12:24 AM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 208 (80175)
01-22-2004 6:55 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by truthlover
01-22-2004 2:34 PM


Thank You for you insight, i really appreciate it
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by truthlover, posted 01-22-2004 2:34 PM truthlover has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Warren, posted 01-23-2004 2:08 PM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 208 (80185)
01-22-2004 7:57 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by johnfolton
01-22-2004 3:25 PM


Whatever, Thank you for all you insightful and helpful words, and i'm sry as well for betraying our faith with my needless comments and unchristian response.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by johnfolton, posted 01-22-2004 3:25 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by johnfolton, posted 01-22-2004 8:38 PM bran_sept88 has replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 208 (80192)
01-22-2004 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by johnfolton
01-22-2004 8:38 PM


Whatever, is there anyway i could get your email address i would enjoy corresponding with a fellow creationist who has apparently studies this out. You Can email it to me at brando@adgintegrated.com Thx again for the encouragement!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by johnfolton, posted 01-22-2004 8:38 PM johnfolton has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Silent H, posted 01-23-2004 1:05 AM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 146 of 208 (80586)
01-25-2004 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by FliesOnly
01-23-2004 9:23 AM


Flies,
I apologized, if I thought that the accusations were grounded I wouldn't have apologized. As i said I was having a bad day to begin with and I come home irate already b/c of school, check my email telling me I got a reply on EvC Forum, so I check and read (this is what slightly offended me, i say that not as a justification, mind you):
FilesOnly writes:
"Let me guess, you attend the same school as Sweetstuff383 and Matt Tucker, meaning you don't really want to hear opposing (and by that I mean "scientific") viewpoints. You just want to write your pathetic paper that will cover the same old crap that has been refuted over and over, by actual practicing scientists."
Now how I saw this as an attack on my friends I don't know, but I'm truly sry. Unfortunately, you were the victim of my bad mood. I typed thoughtlessly and released all the tension and stress of my day on you. If you have never experienced the "angry at everyone" moment, congratulations, but fact is I did and you were wrongly accused and not treated with kindness. At the time i was just mad and not necessarily at you but everyone. Now if this could be put behind us both, and you would please accept my apology and let us both pursue what we see as truth and seek to verify it, I believe that we can both benefit.
Thank you,
BRAN
(P.S. I am coming from an ID stand point and not creationism and also could you please post a description of how evolution explains irreducible complex creatures, it would help to see both perspectives. Thank you and I am truly sry.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by FliesOnly, posted 01-23-2004 9:23 AM FliesOnly has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 1:33 AM bran_sept88 has replied
 Message 179 by FliesOnly, posted 01-26-2004 11:36 AM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 148 of 208 (80661)
01-25-2004 2:04 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by crashfrog
01-25-2004 1:33 AM


Crash,
True, yes but the arch was designed and the scaffold built by the creator, not by a random unguided and creator-less process as stated by ToE.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 1:33 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Silent H, posted 01-25-2004 3:23 PM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 152 by Silent H, posted 01-25-2004 3:25 PM bran_sept88 has not replied
 Message 158 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 6:36 PM bran_sept88 has replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 149 of 208 (80665)
01-25-2004 2:19 PM
Reply to: Message 144 by Loudmouth
01-24-2004 4:06 PM


JonF,
In Genesis we are given the account of Cain and Able, Cain killed his brother and was disowned and became a Gentile, Gentiles are of the line of cain. The gentile line began with Cain pre-flood. Them later, post-flood after all were killed with the exception of noah, came Abraham, as the custom of the Semitic people, if a wife was infertile, she would give her husband her maidservant to bare him an heir, This is what happened with Abraham and Sarah, only the difference was that God promised an heir though Sarah and the child her maidservant gave birth to was then disowned, and all the maidservant's son's descendants were known as Gentiles (outsiders). And that is why we are not all jewish.
Bran

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Loudmouth, posted 01-24-2004 4:06 PM Loudmouth has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 159 of 208 (80708)
01-25-2004 6:41 PM
Reply to: Message 154 by Trixie
01-25-2004 4:44 PM


Re: Think!!!!!
Trixie
Very Interesting, but the only thing you neglected was that both examples remained with in the same species, the fly while different it still was a fly, not a bird or even a wasp but a fly and the syphilis still an illness not another organism.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 154 by Trixie, posted 01-25-2004 4:44 PM Trixie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 7:14 PM bran_sept88 has replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 161 of 208 (80711)
01-25-2004 6:46 PM
Reply to: Message 158 by crashfrog
01-25-2004 6:36 PM


Nature was capable, yes but only if it was instructed by something/ someone, in other word it had the puzzle pieces but it just needed the creator to place the pieces correctly together. pieces + creator = life
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 6:36 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 163 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 7:10 PM bran_sept88 has not replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 168 of 208 (80737)
01-25-2004 9:26 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by crashfrog
01-25-2004 7:14 PM


No not at all. What I am saying is that micro-evolution can occur many times w/o becoming macro-evolution. I most likely do not look anything like you (unless something really sick is going on) and our parents do not look alike, ect.. we all look different but are humans, billions of micro-evolutionary events, rather than calling it micro-evolution i prefer "purposed variation", again a true ID term, but I believe that the creator, who ever it may be, purposed that variation within a species might occur, but not eventually creating a new species.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 7:14 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 11:53 PM bran_sept88 has replied

bran_sept88
Inactive Member


Message 169 of 208 (80739)
01-25-2004 9:36 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by crashfrog
01-25-2004 7:14 PM


Crash,
You brought up that you or I have never seen an irreducibly complex organism created, but also i have never seen anything macro-evolve either, could you please direct me to were i can read up and find out what macro-evolutionary events I am missing out on.
BRAN

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by crashfrog, posted 01-25-2004 7:14 PM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024