Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   bulletproof alternate universe
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 233 of 308 (97304)
04-02-2004 8:17 PM
Reply to: Message 232 by simple
04-02-2004 7:02 PM


Re: light that's yet to be
Why would there be a nearer star difference?
simply because you said so.
before separation: watered down speeded up light
after separation: honeyed up slowed down light
with the universe only 6200 years old by your (weaker than the Hindu Model) version the light from all stars inside 6200 light-year radius of earth is sending honeyed light, while further away all we get is the watered version.
You put the analogy in the hose. This is the reality that comes out of it.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 232 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 7:02 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 237 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 8:39 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 234 of 308 (97305)
04-02-2004 8:18 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by simple
04-02-2004 2:23 PM


The Hindu Model still rules
Still no comment on the Hindo Model ... must be no problems with it that you can find ...
enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 2:23 PM simple has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 235 of 308 (97307)
04-02-2004 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by simple
04-02-2004 6:50 PM


not my problem but yours
you have defined the light and the speeds
are you now introducing a second form of light that is not in the model before? another epicycle -- you're now at 4 and still haven't shown how it can solve the problems inherent in your concept because of your chosen arbitrary date.
those problems do not occur for better models, like the Hindu one, which have sufficient age in them to match the observations of the universe down to teh CMB radiation from 13.7 billion light-years away.
need to go over them again?
refer to begining of the thread. they haven't been answered yet.
enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 6:50 PM simple has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 236 of 308 (97308)
04-02-2004 8:36 PM
Reply to: Message 229 by simple
04-02-2004 6:50 PM


twilight twolight my light you light
you still have the problem of light from stars nearer than 6200 light-years being full source light and light from further further stars being watered ....
and there are further problems to get to if you ever solve the first three ... (none yet ... keep trying)
enjoy.
(ps -- the Hindu Model owns this concept)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 6:50 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 242 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 8:54 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 238 of 308 (97312)
04-02-2004 8:41 PM
Reply to: Message 215 by simple
04-02-2004 4:06 PM


Re: hose flight fantasy light
The light we see now, I think was what was meant. Coming out of the hose still, but much slower than in a spiritual plane, yet in continueous flow. No?
ahahahahaa you are asking me what you meant?
enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 4:06 PM simple has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 239 of 308 (97313)
04-02-2004 8:42 PM
Reply to: Message 215 by simple
04-02-2004 4:06 PM


flat light
The light we see now, I think was what was meant. Coming out of the hose still, but much slower than in a spiritual plane, yet in continueous flow. No?
But no, it could not be just the stars because the separation would have been across the board throughout all space. Any light "created" by the separation would be uniformly distributed and result in a flat CMB distribution.
enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 4:06 PM simple has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 240 of 308 (97314)
04-02-2004 8:44 PM
Reply to: Message 215 by simple
04-02-2004 4:06 PM


Re: hose light
That the CMB distribution is not flat is another problem for you.
along with the red-shift ... and others
but try to handle the first three first eh?
enjoy.
(ps -- not a problem for the Hindu Model ...)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 4:06 PM simple has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 243 of 308 (97318)
04-02-2004 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 228 by Melchior
04-02-2004 5:00 PM


a matter of some gravity
the formula is
F = G*m*M/d/d where
  • F is the force (here of gravitational attraction)
  • G is a constant
  • m is the mass of the attracted body (boy)
  • M is the mass of the attractive body (girl)
  • d is the distance between the center of mass of m to the center of mass of M (thus a man in a deep mine is still pulled towards the center of the earth)
On the surface of the earth this defaults to the more familiar f=g*m where g = ~10 m/s/s = G*M/d/d (where d = the average radius of the earth)
So yes, the closer the boy and girl get, the stronger the force, and as they collapse on the floor, the closer they can get ...

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 228 by Melchior, posted 04-02-2004 5:00 PM Melchior has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 245 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 9:00 PM RAZD has replied
 Message 246 by Melchior, posted 04-02-2004 9:08 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 250 of 308 (97343)
04-02-2004 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by simple
04-02-2004 9:12 PM


Re: a matter of some gravity
s'okay

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 9:12 PM simple has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 251 of 308 (97352)
04-02-2004 9:43 PM
Reply to: Message 246 by Melchior
04-02-2004 9:08 PM


Re: a matter of some gravity
not quite what I said -- perceived from inside the black hole the distances would appear unchanged, but view from outside they would be reduced in size -- it is the relativity space warped thing.
the gravity force of the star as measured from far enough away before and after the collapse would be the same -- nothing has been added or taken from the equation to change that significantly.
this usually takes a super-nova to produce - lesser nova produce "neutron stars" that are super dense but still allow light to escape - and the outer material gets blown off while the inner material gets blown in, compacted. {{if you measure the gravity from inside the blown away shell ... it should be less?}}
If the force is great enough it will be compressed inside the "event horizon" for its mass and become a black hole.
In theory any amount of mass could be compacted into a black hole, but the forces needed are cosmic in scale so it won't happen even for something the size of our sun.
QAD nutshell explanation.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 246 by Melchior, posted 04-02-2004 9:08 PM Melchior has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 252 of 308 (97353)
04-02-2004 9:44 PM
Reply to: Message 245 by simple
04-02-2004 9:00 PM


Re: a matter of some gravity
ahahahahahaaa
happy in deed

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 245 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 9:00 PM simple has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 253 of 308 (97355)
04-02-2004 9:52 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by simple
04-02-2004 8:54 PM


signed lights on who's home?
The reason we see it even from far away, would be because, it was already on the way here as it was slowed.
light from before already arrived, light slowed in ((now 12 day) "process") affected by that stretching to be very significantly different from 'normal' light and thus will be noticeably different for stars inside the "age horizon" from those outside the "horizon" by a factor of 2 million.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 8:54 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 257 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 10:09 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 254 of 308 (97358)
04-02-2004 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by simple
04-02-2004 8:54 PM


some process still undefined
If it wasn't simple slowing to present speed, then some process from the seperation which resulted in our physical light.
shouldn't affect our weight. any word on the biblical justification on the 12 days?
(the Hindu model rules)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 8:54 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 258 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 10:11 PM RAZD has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 255 of 308 (97359)
04-02-2004 9:57 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by simple
04-02-2004 8:54 PM


Re: dear abby
If it wasn't simple slowing to present speed, then some process from the seperation which resulted in our physical light. The process left us seeing the far away light still, but light was changed, for our plane, so it was slow now.
and the change from one to the other was by a factor of 2 million. I think most people would notice ... maybe not all but most.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 8:54 PM simple has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 256 of 308 (97360)
04-02-2004 9:59 PM
Reply to: Message 242 by simple
04-02-2004 8:54 PM


expecting ...
PS If you do reply please try to be clear you are not playing games, if you expect any real answer from me.
I am stil waiting patiently for an answer to all three of my little concerns that create sever problems for your version of the concept.
I also look for a response on the Hindu Model, which does not have the problems I have outlined with your version.
enjoy.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 242 by simple, posted 04-02-2004 8:54 PM simple has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024