No, he stole a small piece of bread and, regardless of whether Catholics are upset or not, no-one who doubts the reality of transubstantiation has any cause to view it any other way.
Let me doubt the reality of transubstantiation here for a minute.... I can still think of a cause to view it another way. Like the Catholic League said in the article that the OP linked to, this was a "hate crime", well... it would have been if there had there been a criminal offense.
According to wikipedia:
quote:
A hate crime is a criminal offense committed against a person or property motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender's bias against a racial group, religion, ethnicity, gender, sexual preference, or disability.
Now, if I take your attitude towards hate crimes against Catholics, and replace it with some other racial group, religion, ethnicity, gender, sexual preference, or disability term.... I'll use "gay-retarded-black-jews" in an attempt to equally offend everyone so I don't get accused of discrimination.
I am certainly not saying that
Catholics gay-retarded-black-jews don't have room to be annoyed here, after all, their beliefs are being disrespected (snip).
The thing is, that no-one is required to respect anyone else's beliefs. It was disrespectful. Oh dear. My advice to offended
Catholics gay-retarded-black-jews would be to get over it.
I just don't care. They are getting their knickers in a twist over nothing. They should grow up.
Is that any more annoying? Or does it not being a criminal offense mean that it is "nothing"?
To me, it seemed like a pretty shitty thing to do.... criminal or not, this was a hate crime in my book (he didn't technically "steal" it, but he
stole it)
Now, its not a cause for death threats, but there's cause to view it more than:
quote:
he stole a small piece of bread