Having been intimately involved with the "abortion industry" for a time (I worked at PP for a while, and my wife did for several years, in the education department), I find the notion of using abortion as birth control idiotic. But then, those who do so are a tiny, tiny minority. Most of those getting abortions got them for financial or psychological reasons. Many were married women, accompanied by their husbands. Not a few were actually anti-abortion protesters - after all, their situations were "different"...
Abortion - that is, control of the local population - has always been a part of human life, along with infanticide. It is a necessity, whether anyone wants to admit it or not.
I understand the objections ot abortion. Some are logical and valid, many are not. I cannot fathom, for example the position that once conception has taken place, the birth must occur, as is the position of the more extreme anti-abortion corwd, even if the fetus is severely deformed. And I know this not only from reading their materials and hearing them speak, but fror 'personal' experience. A neighbor of mine's sister-in-law was pregnant. Anti-abortion. An ultrasound detected acrania and myeloschisis - absence of a skull and an open neural tube. A fatal condition. Rather than abort, these good little Christians rode out the pregnany, knowing that the fetus would die a slow, painful death if it survived the birth. Survive it did. A whole 3 hours or so. Struggling to breath, completely unresponsive (how could it respond? it had only a brainstem), it finally died.
But at least it was born...
I suggest doing a Google Images search for "Harlequin fetus."
And I challenge the anti-abortionists to logically justify not terminating such a fetus - regardless of gestational age - upon diagnosis.