The United States is one of the few democracies in the world without a Parliament (and off the top of my head, I can't think of another.) It's quite telling that of all the talk we've had about "spreading democracy" to other nations, not once have we ever established an American form of government. It's always been parliamentary. We just established a parliament in Iraq.
I've noted that before.
For those who think the US style government is the best in the world, it is curious that not more is said about the forms of government the Botch Administration is busy setting up in Afghanistan and Iraq -- if we are truly concerned with establishing freedom and democracy and the great american way eh?
What is truly curious is that no real thought has gone into developing any improved system beyond either the US or a parilamentary system.
I would think this would be something the UN could develop, knowing that new governments will be created, that dictatorships will fall and leave a vacuum -- why not have a model govenment that could be adapted? Or have we really plumbed the depths of forms of government and this is all there is?
ps -- you could consider the Congress to be a parliamentary body, complete with their own selected leader, just that he has no authority outside congress. You could also consider the Senate to be similar to the House of Lords in the way they represent the states. The division of power is more about having redundant mechanisms (checks and balances) than about the actual kind of body - and the way it is run - involved in the process of making and enforcing laws, and the real difference is having the President independent of the {Congress\Senate}.
I don't think the Judiciary is sufficiently independent from the executive branch however.
Join the effort to unravel {AIDS\HIV} with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.