Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ruling: No Separation of Church and State?
Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 66 (272182)
12-23-2005 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Silent H
12-23-2005 4:36 PM


Activist judges
More info: http://clelaw.lib.oh.us/public/decision/CTA6/122005.html
I can only hope that this goes to a higher court or something.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Silent H, posted 12-23-2005 4:36 PM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by RAZD, posted 12-23-2005 9:09 PM Funkaloyd has replied
 Message 18 by Rrhain, posted 12-24-2005 5:36 AM Funkaloyd has not replied

  
Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 66 (272364)
12-24-2005 4:04 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by randman
12-24-2005 3:50 AM


Re: Respecting ...?
If "respecting" means "concerning" or "regarding", then isn't the second part of that sentence ("or prohibiting...") a little redundant?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by randman, posted 12-24-2005 3:50 AM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Nuggin, posted 12-24-2005 1:32 PM Funkaloyd has not replied

  
Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 66 (272366)
12-24-2005 4:24 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by RAZD
12-23-2005 9:09 PM


Re: Activist judges - and blatant falsehoods.
RAZD writes:
clearly this is stretching well beyond the truth to make a point that does not in fact stand to honest scrutiny.
So you think that they're covering up the religious nature of the display, rather than just wrong about the historical significance of the Ten Commandments?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by RAZD, posted 12-23-2005 9:09 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by RAZD, posted 12-24-2005 2:25 PM Funkaloyd has not replied

  
Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 28 of 66 (272486)
12-24-2005 2:08 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Nuggin
12-24-2005 1:52 PM


Re: Respecting ...?
Y'all need a parliamentary system.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Nuggin, posted 12-24-2005 1:52 PM Nuggin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by nwr, posted 12-24-2005 3:01 PM Funkaloyd has not replied
 Message 35 by Rrhain, posted 12-24-2005 9:32 PM Funkaloyd has replied

  
Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 66 (272575)
12-24-2005 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Rrhain
12-24-2005 9:32 PM


Re: Respecting ...?
Rrhain writes:
You think party politics is bad in the US, try it in a Parliamentary system where you don't choose your representative. Your party does.
In NZ's system at least (MMP/AMS), you get to chose one of your representatives.
In the Westminster system (used by the UK, Canada, Australia, etc.), the prime minister is appointed by the head of state (in the Commonwealth countries, that would be Queen Elizabeth.)
Whereas in the United States, the president is chosen by the Electoral College. But both the EC and British monarchy are nothing more than unimportant vessels of tradition, with no de facto power.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Rrhain, posted 12-24-2005 9:32 PM Rrhain has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024