Concerns for Percy

Yeah I know what you are saying, however, that is the post of Willowtree, not AdminWillow.At school we have a strategy whereby we give a troublesome student some responsibilities, when they are in 'responsibility mode' they are completely different, they appreciate people having faith in them.I do not in any way try to condone these comments, my opinion is that AdminWillow would be a different person from everyday member Willowtree. We cannot judge AdminWillow on the actions of Willowtree.Brian.

WT DOES NOT have my vote. He's a disgrace to Christ, Christianity, and other Christians, imo.

Perhaps it would be a good idea for Percy and other admins to post a "job description" of just what is expected of a moderator or admin.There will be a large range of variation in how the job is done but I think it is fair to be a bit specific in case it becomes necessary to remove admin "priviledges" ( if they are such a thing). This hasn't had to happen before has it.If we attempt to extend the job a lot then it may be necessary to start admining the admins. Not a good thing but it might be avoided if the nature of the job is made clearer at the beginning.

John 8:7

ROFL!!!! wonderful!!!

quote:

---

Schraf, the problem is that when Buz kicks your ideological butt, you and some others sometimes resort to pure substanceless yada, much of which simply isn't worth my precious time for responses. You then go whining about forum rules.

---

Yeah, right buz.I'm still waiting for your reponse to Message #1 in the thread "Women and the Fundamentalist View of Marriage" started 5/24.I started that thread because the previous one that we had been using for this subject, "Women and Religion - Does it Anger You?", was approaching the 300 post mark and was going to be shut down soon.So, I guess when you say "Buzsaw has kicked your ideological butt", what you really mean is, "I ran off because I couldn't address the arguments."

Does this personal rant have anything to do with the fact that I, in my: "What God thinks of Fundementalism" topic wiped the floor with Buzsaw's fundementalism from his home field - the Bible ?I argued directly from the Bible, arguments that have been there for two thousand years and Buz got whipped fair and square. Those arguments were from the mind of God/N.T. and Buzsaw finally got put in his place.

I have nominated Ken Demyer for this possible Admin position.But Ken has told me he will not be posting until at least September.Therefore, in lieu of this, I think the next best objective person is Berberry, therefore I nominate him.

please see previous post

You remind me of the Black Knight in the movie Monty Python and the Holy Grail.--Percy

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Hey, what is this? Election time? I didn't know people were voting for me. Apparently, Willowtree's logic boat has left the harbour. First he says I'm an evo/creo hybrid, and people should pick an outright "creo".....So then he recommends Berberry?????......., Am I the only confused person here or something?Thanks for the votes, I'm amazed that many voted, but I'm not running for election at the moment and it would be an impossibility cos I would lose my naughty boy priveliges if I became admin,....So there's a bigger chance of satan converting to christianity......, --> so I vote for Buzsaw and/or Borntopreach/Willowtree.ps. I am not a hybrid people! Just a rather uniquely positioned creo of sorts. Tis confusion - give God the glory, or I'll spank your inner baba.

Mike, the only reason I have not endorsed you per se is because Admin Truthlover already adequately represents the creo-evo hybrid. Another reason is because you recently "denigrated" the O.T. while implying that it is not the eternal word of God. By defintion, a creo believes the Bible to be the eternal word of God.IF a true creo is not elevated (no hybrid beliefs) THEN I would like to see the most objective person get it. I know my previous comment implies that a pure creo candidate is not the most objective, this is why I have nominated Berberry who I believe IS objective.By the hybrid standard I am technically one because I know evolution WITHIN animal species is a fact. (I said 'animal' not human) This micro-observance is assumed out into the macro (edit: by evos and therein is the "origin" of all the error.This message has been edited by WILLOWTREE, 07-04-2004 06:43 PM

Nah, Mike the wiz can carry on as he does. AdminWiz just has to behave. It is important to try to keep the two separate.

It's not that I demand your vote WT, I just wondered why you thought me a hybrid. I don't recall denigrating the OT. Maybe I was gooning around, you'd have to show me the post I made. Nevertheless, the OT isn't God anyway, it's a book, that doesn't mean I'm not an OT fan though, as I still see it as God's inspired word. Come on WT, it's not like I divide the clothe or sacrifice bulls. Be a clever poster, not a silly poster. As for my possible adminwiz, I still dunno Ned. I personally don't think it's my thing....