Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,895 Year: 4,152/9,624 Month: 1,023/974 Week: 350/286 Day: 6/65 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Seashells on tops of mountains.
EighteenDelta
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 343 (425636)
10-03-2007 9:38 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by Minnemooseus
10-03-2007 6:41 AM


Re: The message 4 diagram
Totally a guess on my part, but the way I read it, he is saying the fossil evidence, if read in the context of a young earth, would require water to conform to the level of the rocks, creating an even depth of water worldwide, since shells and other sea life type fossils are more evenly spread out and not distinguished a elevations. Sorry for the run-on sentence.
-x

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Minnemooseus, posted 10-03-2007 6:41 AM Minnemooseus has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by NosyNed, posted 10-03-2007 10:04 AM EighteenDelta has not replied

  
EighteenDelta
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 343 (425697)
10-03-2007 7:27 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by TheWay
10-03-2007 7:17 PM


Re: hi, first post
http://EvC Forum: Was there a worldwide flood? -->EvC Forum: Was there a worldwide flood?
Might be a good place to start, if the thread is exhausted a new one could be started.
-x

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by TheWay, posted 10-03-2007 7:17 PM TheWay has not replied

  
EighteenDelta
Inactive Member


Message 123 of 343 (428332)
10-16-2007 12:53 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by TheWay
10-16-2007 12:41 AM


Re: When did Lithification Occur during Flood Year?
If you want a one-on-one debate, we have a thread for that, its called the great debate, otherwise expect the topic to be responded at large.
you ask writes:
The heat from radioactive decay?
It seems pretty clearly stated, even quoted by you
heat generated at faults from the frictional forces.
Friction is totally unrelated to radioactive decay. I get the feeling you don't understand the topic being discussed and are simple repeating what PRATT you have read, yet don't understand.
I highly suggest you check out the thread by 'The Matt', explaining the basics of geology, it will help you understand what you are trying to argue against.
http://EvC Forum: Geology- working up from basic principles. -->EvC Forum: Geology- working up from basic principles.
-x

"Debate is an art form. It is about the winning of arguments. It is not about the discovery of truth. There are certain rules and procedures to debate that really have nothing to do with establishing fact ” which creationists have mastered. Some of those rules are: never say anything positive about your own position because it can be attacked, but chip away at what appear to be the weaknesses in your opponent's position. They are good at that. I don't think I could beat the creationists at debate. I can tie them. But in courtrooms they are terrible, because in courtrooms you cannot give speeches. In a courtroom you have to answer direct questions about the positive status of your belief. We destroyed them in Arkansas. On the second day of the two-week trial we had our victory party!"
-Stephen Jay Gould

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by TheWay, posted 10-16-2007 12:41 AM TheWay has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by TheWay, posted 10-17-2007 2:44 PM EighteenDelta has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024