If you want a one-on-one debate, we have a thread for that, its called the great debate, otherwise expect the topic to be responded at large.
you ask writes:
The heat from radioactive decay?
It seems pretty clearly stated, even quoted by you
heat generated at faults from the frictional forces.
Friction is totally unrelated to radioactive decay. I get the feeling you don't understand the topic being discussed and are simple repeating what PRATT you have read, yet don't understand.
I highly suggest you check out the thread by 'The Matt', explaining the basics of geology, it will help you understand what you are trying to argue against.
http://
EvC Forum: Geology- working up from basic principles. -->
EvC Forum: Geology- working up from basic principles.
-x
"Debate is an art form. It is about the winning of arguments. It is not about the discovery of truth. There are certain rules and procedures to debate that really have nothing to do with establishing fact ” which creationists have mastered. Some of those rules are: never say anything positive about your own position because it can be attacked, but chip away at what appear to be the weaknesses in your opponent's position. They are good at that. I don't think I could beat the creationists at debate. I can tie them. But in courtrooms they are terrible, because in courtrooms you cannot give speeches. In a courtroom you have to answer direct questions about the positive status of your belief. We destroyed them in Arkansas. On the second day of the two-week trial we had our victory party!"
-Stephen Jay Gould