Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does evidence of transitional forms exist ? (Hominid and other)
LudvanB
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 301 (5820)
02-28-2002 12:26 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by redstang281
02-28-2002 12:12 PM


quote:
Originally posted by redstang281:
Even if the fossils are not in question, the interpretation still remains.
There is a variety of skulls in human population today and we're all human.
I can line up all the pens on my desk in order from smallest to biggest, but that doesn't prove they evolved from an eraser.

Your pens are not living creatures Red....i always find this "cars dont evolve" argument to be such a blatant sign of its proponents ignorance. LIFE is the basic requirement for ANYTHING to evolve

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by redstang281, posted 02-28-2002 12:12 PM redstang281 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by redstang281, posted 02-28-2002 12:28 PM LudvanB has replied

LudvanB
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 301 (5823)
02-28-2002 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by redstang281
02-28-2002 12:25 PM


quote:
Originally posted by redstang281:
Exactly! I think this is the exact reason why there is a lack of creationist on this board. It becomes an enormous waste of time when everything you say is "a lie."

My My...talk about the pot calling the kettle black. I think that YECs are the LAST people on earth in a position to accuse ANYONE of lying...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by redstang281, posted 02-28-2002 12:25 PM redstang281 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by joz, posted 02-28-2002 1:17 PM LudvanB has not replied
 Message 57 by redstang281, posted 02-28-2002 1:35 PM LudvanB has not replied

LudvanB
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 301 (5825)
02-28-2002 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by redstang281
02-28-2002 12:28 PM


quote:
Originally posted by redstang281:
It doesn't take long to get evolutionist down to resorting to the good old ignorance arguement does it?

Thats because you make it so damn easy for us to point out the ignorance in your statements. Name me ONE evolutionist that ever advanced the hypothesis that UNLIVING material can EVOLVE.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by redstang281, posted 02-28-2002 12:28 PM redstang281 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Minnemooseus, posted 02-28-2002 12:45 PM LudvanB has not replied
 Message 58 by redstang281, posted 02-28-2002 1:38 PM LudvanB has replied

LudvanB
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 301 (5833)
02-28-2002 2:05 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by redstang281
02-28-2002 1:38 PM


quote:
Originally posted by redstang281:
I guess you missed the point of my analogy.
No Red,i havent...the point of your analogy was absurd and i pointed this out to you. Evolution requires living material....at least,compare apples with apples

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by redstang281, posted 02-28-2002 1:38 PM redstang281 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024