Does evidence of transitional forms exist ? (Hominid and other)

hi guys
sorry for interrupting current duscussion but was there any creationist answer to that original posting suggesting that
turkana boy was a human ancestor? perhaps in other topics/threads?
thanks, dents

well, i didn't get it quite .. they consider it human or apes? actually my perception is that it is a transitional form between ancient apes and modern human .. i think so because the skull has got both ape and human traits .. i'm looking for some creationist opinion re turkana boy plus some nice reasoning behind it ... just don't be shy creationsts out there

hmmm .. i meant the ape-like common ancestor species of course .. my appology for non-exact wording .. back to the questionit appears that the turkana boy is a transitional form between ape-like common ancestor and modern human ... what is the creationist opinion about this fossil?(should it be a human, why looking so ape-like? should it be a kind of ape, what about its human measures?)