Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Question on English Language to British Members
Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2439 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 29 of 79 (542410)
01-09-2010 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by InGodITrust
01-09-2010 2:28 PM


Re: Write Better Than You Speak
My sister, who has some writing talent, has begrudgingly resigned herself to using "they" in place of "he/she" because it is now so commonly used in speech.
Personally, I have a hard time using "they" in this instance. In fact, it would grate less on my nerves than using "he/she" anyday. This is similar to another incorrect usage of singular vs. plural pronouns and their verbs: "...one out of three American and British men enjoy seeing Angelina Jolie naked..." as opposed to the correct "...one out of three American and British men enjoys seeing Angelina Jolie naked..."
I...what was I saying again?
Have a good one.
Edited by Apothecus, : Grammar, of course.
Edited by Apothecus, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by InGodITrust, posted 01-09-2010 2:28 PM InGodITrust has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by onifre, posted 01-10-2010 11:03 PM Apothecus has not replied

  
Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2439 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 35 of 79 (542641)
01-11-2010 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee
01-11-2010 6:36 AM


Talking of male and female fire fighters, does anyone know if it’s possible to obtain a calendar of topless female fire fighters? If not, I think there ought to be one, just to balance things out and ensure nobody's offended.
This is way off topic, but I've known a fair number of firefighting madames, and in my experience, if the definition of topless doesn't include brown bag on head then I'm not with ya.
Just sayin'.
Have a good one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Jumped Up Chimpanzee, posted 01-11-2010 6:36 AM Jumped Up Chimpanzee has not replied

  
Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2439 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 39 of 79 (542685)
01-11-2010 9:25 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Blue Jay
01-11-2010 4:03 PM


Re: While we're complaining about language conventions...
Bluejay writes:
Languages should include as few underived rules as possible.
Anyone ever read Orwell's 1984? In it, he wrote about a principle called "Newspeak", which served to eliminate portions of the English language considered unneeded or redundant.
See here: http://www.newspeakdictionary.com/ns-prin.html
In Orwell's dystopia, this:
The reporting of Big Brother's "Order of the Day" in the Times of December 3rd 1983 is extremely unsatisfactory and makes reference to nonexistent persons. Rewrite it in full and submit your draft to higher authority before filing.
becomes this:
Times 3.12.83 reporting bb dayorder doubleplusungood refs unperson rewrite fullwise upsub antefiling.
Now I'm not advocating the demise of democracy in order to use "knife" to replace all synonyms of the word "cut". But I agree with Bluejay on this point. Much of what we speak is useless trash which does nothing to further the understanding of the English language.
I do, however, like the idea of the "2 Minutes Hate." Big Brother's got something there.
Have a good one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Blue Jay, posted 01-11-2010 4:03 PM Blue Jay has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Modulous, posted 01-12-2010 9:49 AM Apothecus has replied

  
Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2439 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 46 of 79 (542776)
01-12-2010 2:22 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Modulous
01-12-2010 9:49 AM


Re: While we're complaining about language conventions...
I hear Fox is particularly adept at it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Modulous, posted 01-12-2010 9:49 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

  
Apothecus
Member (Idle past 2439 days)
Posts: 275
From: CA USA
Joined: 01-05-2010


Message 49 of 79 (542807)
01-12-2010 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Larni
01-12-2010 3:13 PM


Re: Brit Vs American - Written Vs Spoken
I'm not sure about that but they have that damned question intonation?
Australia? You only need go so far as Minnesota to get that.
Ok, have a good one, then?
p.s. My 7yo was down here and loves your Fett avatar. No disintegrations.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Larni, posted 01-12-2010 3:13 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-13-2010 11:18 AM Apothecus has not replied
 Message 51 by Larni, posted 01-13-2010 11:57 AM Apothecus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024