Based on that defilnition can man judge a supernatural being? Man may know of a supernatual being by words of revelation, actions made know to man etc. but man can never judge a supernatural. If the supernatural is beyond scientific understanding how can man judge this being?
Of course sentient and moral humans can judge actions of others - even supernatural. We judge things all the time by our own moral codes. I long ago dismissed Yahweh as morally inferior to almost the entire human species - based on his own actions as lovingly described throughout the bible - literally condemned by his own words....I defy you to mount a defence of 'his' morality - in an appropriate thread of course.
As far as this OP is concerned Occam's razor says it all...
No evidence whatsoever of any designer and, instead, a mechanism explained quite happily by science in absence of a designer...quite simple really. Since around 1859 we really haven't needed the 'God' hypothesis at all (I'll let you work out the significance of the date if you haven't already).