Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Significance of the Dover Decision
Vacate
Member (Idle past 4629 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 10-01-2006


Message 93 of 150 (452310)
01-30-2008 1:18 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by randman
01-30-2008 12:32 AM


Re: a general reply
After awhile, it will become increasingly untenable and appear unfair and discriminatory to deny and restrict ID on religious or rather anti-religious grounds claiming such ideas have no place in science.
Truth is based on percentages?
How many people believe in homeopathy, dead aliens at Area 51, Bush blowing up the twin towers, psychics, healing moonbeams (my favourite), haunted houses, astrology, wiccan magic, shamanism, crystal healing, levitation, divination, perpetual motion, faces (or more recently Bigfoot) on mars, crop circles, aliens probing cow anuses, vaccines causing autism, vampires, exorcism, flouride in water causing stupidity, bermuda triangle, jewish world domination, the US did not land on the moon, elvis is alive (or is he dead now?), atlantis, no holocaust, alien landing strips in South America, Voodoo, and most important last tuesdayism.
Sorry if I missed a bunch. The list of nuts is miles long and they are all claiming discrimination from having a place in science.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by randman, posted 01-30-2008 12:32 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by randman, posted 01-30-2008 4:03 AM Vacate has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024