Jar writes:
The issue is not free speech but whether or not in their official duties they can pitch the woo.
Lets liken this analogy to wheelchair access. Our pluralistic society protects the rights of the minority rather than voting with the majority, right? Hence, wheelchair access gives the one guy out of 20 an equal access, right? Neither the 19 able bodied people nor the one handicapped person are thus denied access to a facility.
Now lets take a front line during battle. A Chaplain is dispatched to the front. There is a group of twenty men. 16 are Christians, (12 of those Evangelicals) 2 Jews, one Atheist/Agnostic, and one Rastafarian. The group is about to go out on a deadly mission and seeks prayers from the Chaplain.
If the Chaplain is given time to pray with each group, all will have equal access to his services, so to speak. If he is a good Chaplain, he will understand the diverse needs of each group of people and will accommodate them. His job is to listen, show compassion, and provide a loving, unbiased, and non-judgmental support for each and every member of the Armed Forces.
If there is only time for a quick group prayer, I can see where the issue becomes clear. What is happening is that the evangelical majority is demanding that only their type of prayer (involving Jesus name) be used since they may die that day and want what they consider to be last rites.
This is discriminatory against the minority faction present at that time and place, however.
I read an interesting Blog by a Military Chaplain concerning his private thoughts on the matter. He looks to be an evangelical yet has quite a mature outlook on knowing his role as a Chaplain.
I also found a good and balanced article on the subject of what a Chaplain is supposed to do here.