Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Denouncing religions ? [New to debate]
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 8 of 89 (388940)
03-09-2007 7:31 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by anastasia
03-08-2007 11:23 PM


quote:
What would be interesting to me is to discover what if anything other religions have to say about science, and to find out why it is mainly christianity involved in the debate.
Here's a good place to start on that question, ana:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/ev_denom.htm

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by anastasia, posted 03-08-2007 11:23 PM anastasia has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by ICANT, posted 03-13-2007 7:10 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 17 of 89 (389565)
03-14-2007 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by ICANT
03-13-2007 7:10 PM


quote:
I am a farm boy so I understand evolution, I think. You can improve livestock by selective breeding. You can improve seeds by selective pollination. I have evolved from a strong agile youth to a dotting old fool.
No, that's not evolution. That's just aging.
Individuals do not evolve; populations do.
quote:
But I have never seen nor has anyone ever been able to show me one piece of evidence of macro evolution (one species becoming another species).
There is lots of evidence (though off-topic for this thread) of speciation. There is so much of it that even the major Creation "science" organizations no longer deny that speciation occurs.
If you would like to propose a thread to discuss the evidence for speciation, I would be delighted to participate.
quote:
I believe that true science is true. I believe that theories are just that, whether it is one man's opinion or millions.
FYI, the way scientists use the word "theory" is different from the layman's use of the word.
Scientific "theories" are not just somebody's "opinion". They are, in fact, very well-supported explanations of facts.
For example, we have the Atomic Theory of Matter, Gravitational Theory, the Germ Theory of Disease, and the Theory of a Heliocentric Solar System.
Do you consider any of these ideas mere "opinions"?
But again, all of this is off topic for this thread. If you would like to propose a thread to discuss how science works (which I think you would benefit from), please do so and I'd be there to participate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by ICANT, posted 03-13-2007 7:10 PM ICANT has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2198 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 19 of 89 (389691)
03-14-2007 9:41 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by ICANT
03-14-2007 9:22 PM


Re: Re-Religious Studies
quote:
You cannot even say God bless you if someone sneezes without offending someone.
Exaggerate much?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by ICANT, posted 03-14-2007 9:22 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by ICANT, posted 03-15-2007 12:30 AM nator has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024