Based on the logic you gave Mike, would such logic not indicate more of an agnostic position rather than an atheist position?
This shows the ignorance most people have when discussing theism, atheism and agnosticism.
Agnosticism is not the middle between atheism and theism.
Atheism and theism have to do with belief.
Agnosticism and gnosticism have to do with knowledge.
I am an agnostic atheist. I have no belief in a god, but I have no knowledge if there is or is not a god. To me that is unknowable.
I would think there are very few atheists that would claim to be gnostic atheists.
On the theistic side the spectrum we see here would be, I think, Jar and Faith. Jar would probably say he has no knowledge of a god. Therefore, he is an agnostic theist. Faith on the other hand is a gnostic theist. Faith claims knowledge that a god exists.
I know you like to use the word agnostic as if agnostics are not evil like atheists, but that is the wrong use of the term.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.