The Origin of Novelty

No you have not shown the transitionals leading up to australopithecus, nor have you shown the transitionals leading past the australopithecus towards a human. Isn't it strange that the australopithecus is commonly found, but the transitionals from small pelvis apes to the australopithecus are not found?? Yet proportional to height, the australopithecus has an even wider pelvis than a human. So the wonderful human-like pelvis feature developed how?? Where's the evidence? where's the evidence of its subsequent REDUCING in size to human proportions along with increasing brain size and along with decreasing gorilla morphology that has been found in Lucy? Show me the evidence? In the meantime it looks like a widespread ape that disappeared without subsequent evolving. That's the fossil facts.Faced with the evidence, and without distorting facts with desperation to find a missing link, scientists say the following:
Just a moment...
""Because modern humans, chimpanzees, orangutans, and many other primates share a ramal morphology that differs from that of gorillas, the gorilla anatomy must represent a unique condition, and its appearance in fossil hominins must represent an independently derived morphology. This particular morphology appears also in Australopithecus robustus. The presence of the morphology in both the latter and Au. afarensis and its absence in modern humans cast doubt on the role of Au. afarensis as a modern human ancestor. ""As usual, on further analysis, the creation view of a number of species in existence, with no evolutionary sequence to show how they got there, is confirmed.Edited by mindspawn, : No reason given.Edited by mindspawn, : No reason given.