Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The moral implications of evolution, and their discontents.
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4174 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 10 of 124 (438583)
12-05-2007 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Fosdick
12-05-2007 11:20 AM


Re: Morality and bicamerality
Hoot Mon writes:
But if the evolution of human consciousness is at all biological we'd have to say that morality is an atavism of the primitive bicaremal state of mind (per Julian Jaynes).
Uh? Morality is a throwback to believing in God...is that what you're trying to say?
Hoot Mon writes:
Simply put, science became the necessary tool for humans to evolve beyond bicamerality in order to gain our advanced form of consciousness.
We used science to eliminate our need for God?
Honestly, I have no idea what you're trying to say here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Fosdick, posted 12-05-2007 11:20 AM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Fosdick, posted 12-05-2007 12:16 PM FliesOnly has replied

  
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4174 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 12 of 124 (438606)
12-05-2007 1:24 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Fosdick
12-05-2007 12:16 PM


Re: Morality and bicamerality
Hey, I was just trying to figure out if I was reading your post correctly.
Hoot Mon writes:
Morality is an artifact of a belief system, not as fact of life or reality.
So evolutionary theory has no bearing on morality. On this we agree?
Hoot Mon writes:
If I regard myself as "amoral" would you then regard me as "immoral"?
I would regard you as amoral.
Hoot Mon writes:
FliesOnly writes:
We used science to eliminate our need for God?
Oh, yes, and it's such a painfil process!
Well, actually science doesn't necessarily lead to the elimination God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Fosdick, posted 12-05-2007 12:16 PM Fosdick has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Fosdick, posted 12-05-2007 2:36 PM FliesOnly has not replied

  
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4174 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 54 of 124 (439049)
12-07-2007 7:42 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by kuresu
12-07-2007 4:24 AM


Way OT...but I have to ask
Kuresu, let me start by saying that I enjoyed your latest post (as a way of keeping it ever so slightly on topic). The many lies of so many "Christians" are so well documented that it's stunning the denial(s) they put forth.
Nonetheless, on to the reason for this message. In looking at you photo, you look so unbelievably familiar to someone I know that I have to ask...are you really from Boulder Co (...or maybe I should ask...are you currently in Boulder Co), and/or are you actually living on an Island out in Lake Michigan?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by kuresu, posted 12-07-2007 4:24 AM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by kuresu, posted 12-07-2007 11:56 AM FliesOnly has replied

  
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4174 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 62 of 124 (439159)
12-07-2007 2:32 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by kuresu
12-07-2007 11:56 AM


Re: Way OT...Thanks...and now we're done...maybe...
Kuresu:
I can assure you that you have a twin . And oddly, if it means anything (and there's no reason it should)...he's a really nice guy and now, when I read your posts, I find myself "hearing" them in his voice.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by kuresu, posted 12-07-2007 11:56 AM kuresu has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by bluegenes, posted 12-07-2007 2:43 PM FliesOnly has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024