Is ID falsifiable by any kind of experiment?

I looked at your PNT (proposed new topic) on intelligence: What will be the immediate impact if a science theory is wrong in science?.It is hopelessly confused. Why do you repeatedly mention intelligence when you are so confused about it?

This is your problem. It isn't our problem.You cannot define "intelligence", yet you make it part of your theory of "new intelligent design". And that's a problem.The Theory of Evolution does not mention "intelligence" so it has no need to define it.

You are mistaken. There is no satisfactory scientific definition of either intelligence or intentionality. So the theory does not mention them.I'll note that, contrary to some of what you have said, the theory of evolution does not say that intelligence isn't involved. It is just silent on that question and restricts itself to what can be observed and measured.

You talk big, after admitting that you cannot claim anything.The simple fact is that you cannot define intelligence in any scientifically useful way. You mostly write nonsense. We cannot falsify your "ideas" because there is nothing there to falsify. All you have is badly tossed word salad.

You do not understand evolution and you do not understand science.

My prediction -- he will do neither.

Give it a try. But I doubt that you have anything recognizable as a model.

Then how about you start giving some detail, instead of the wishy-washy vagueness that we see in your posts.