Evolution is a religion. Creation is a religion.

I DONT think this comes down to the money. Yes we are closer to collecting the sum by posting here on EVC today than yesterday but that there is LESS evidence (scientific) for YEC than BILLIONS of DIFFERENT PROBABLE PLAUSIBILITYES does not mean that the approach to some unconditioned it(creationism) supplies with MORE abduction(should be "deduction" but we just dont have that induced today as of yet) (intellectuallY)DOES NOT(your presumption)gain say more quickly the balance of any future discovery JUST as the present information will be the same total tommarrow. You have assumed a multipolar relation of mind and matter and that by itelf ONLY (to be fair, which I am saying you were not!)puports by way of support the difference if any material probabilites. SO- NO, I dont think there is little of no evidence for GR for the individual selection of path may of present outspace science may ONLY depend on a tensor relation TO celluar physiology generalized per all psycholigies regardless of different favors different races supply or do not or rather should not for any every or all ought(s). But that is my opinion and little subject to reversal by me. His thought of the the "Clock in the BOx" is enough to keep me reading for some more time than Roland Hoffman refused to discuss art and science with me unless I had a taken "quantum mechanics". Just thinking E'GR is enough to show that HOffman was off his video between snakes and DNA but who am I to tell...And creationists are giving this art of thought a hearing where if black hole theorists might suspect Penrose are not.[This message has been edited by Brad McFall, 03-31-2004]

OK I simply disagree. I'll leave that at athat ++. A self-measured velocity and the difference of onevstwo way velocities might amagamate phyiscally but be different bioloigcally. Idont know I'm just saying. I agree to disagree. I dont think we need any mORE discoveries. But again that was me. Thanks for the input.