a worldwide flood could certainly leave limestone deposits in one place
No flood geologist, arm-chair or otherwise, has ever come up with a mechanism for the flood to deposit limestone. The mere existance of limestone refutes the flood without resorting to some "the rules were WAAAY different back then. Up was down, down was up. It was total craziness" kind of argument. Since it is OT for this thread, if you have discovered how a global flood could deposit limestone then please start a thread to inform all of us. I would LOVE to know how that would be possible.
But my point was that whatever you can say about how ridiculous the flood scenario is, can be said back about the ridiculous idea of thick worldwide layers of homogeneous sediments with predictable fossil contents that don't spill over into the layers above and below, but just stay right there in their own peculiar sediment bed, sharply demarcated from the different sediments above and below, very sharply and neatly. Millions of years of only one kind of sediment-plus-particular fossil contents maybe, followed by millions of years of only another completely different kind of sediment. I know I've said this a million times and it's called an argument from incredulity, but some things just don't make sense on the face of them if you actually think about it.[/qs]
Except for all those examples of geologic strata in the real world that refute your over simplification. When choosing between an unformed fantasy of some online poster and the actual rocks that I can go outside and look at, I'll take reality any day. Since this is off topic, how about you go start a thread to back this up. Something more than you just pointing at pictures of the GC and saying, "see look how neat they are!" Somehow I don't think you will but one can always hope.
Back to your regularly scheduled topic.
Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)
™ Version 4.2
