Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Dates and Dating ⇒

Hydrologic Evidence for an Old Earth

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hydrologic Evidence for an Old Earth
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 40 of 174 (326416)
06-26-2006 11:00 AM 		Reply to: Message 36 by Faith
06-26-2006 4:21 AM

Getting it right
Faith,
As was pointed out to you, repeatedly you have your facts about the nature of the geology WRONG.
​
Your conclusions wouldn't be right even if you description of the layers was correct but it is silly to discuss it when you do NOT have it right.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Faith, posted 06-26-2006 4:21 AM Faith has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by Faith, posted 06-26-2006 11:21 AM NosyNed has not replied
  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 70 of 174 (326472)
06-26-2006 1:09 PM 		Reply to: Message 47 by Faith
06-26-2006 11:41 AM

Facts
It's the fact that the layers are so TOTALLY discrete that makes it certain it can't have happened that way. For this to happen once or twice, sure, but over and over again. Too silly for words.
​
I believe that the geologists have pointed out to you that this is not a fact. Repeatedly in fact.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Faith, posted 06-26-2006 11:41 AM Faith has not replied
  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 155 of 174 (326874)
06-27-2006 3:30 PM 		Reply to: Message 60 by Faith
06-26-2006 12:14 PM

thinking
We have looked at what you say:
​
Over and over you have been told that you don't know what the facts of the geology are. You make statements about the nature of the geology that are simply wrong.
​
Starting from wrong facts makes it unlikely you can reach right conclusions.
​
However, even from that starting point it has been pointed out that your conclusions don't stand up. This has been pointed out to you many times too.
​
Being unable to absorb new information can make someone look pretty foolish.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Faith, posted 06-26-2006 12:14 PM Faith has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024