Tranquility Base
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 2 of 145 (12419)
06-30-2002 10:03 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by C.B. Edelman
06-30-2002 1:40 PM
|
|
The reasonable thing to do would be to insert some evidence for biological design and rapid generation of the geological column into to public courses to dismiss the 'appearence' (ha) of bias. If you personally don't believe there is such evidence why not check out my new thread which shows just how such evidence could be incorporated and be competely reasonable.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by C.B. Edelman, posted 06-30-2002 1:40 PM | | C.B. Edelman has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 3 by gene90, posted 07-01-2002 9:33 AM | | Tranquility Base has replied |
|
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 4 of 145 (12503)
07-01-2002 9:07 PM
|
Reply to: Message 3 by gene90
07-01-2002 9:33 AM
|
|
^ Read my post to Percy today in my education thread. I give the reason why we don't publish mainstream often. The gist: even the most obvious arguemnts for design cannot be made mainstream although a good proportion of publishing scientists would agree that design is evident.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 3 by gene90, posted 07-01-2002 9:33 AM | | gene90 has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 71 by nator, posted 12-16-2002 9:49 PM | | Tranquility Base has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2