Idiocy of the most amusing kind.....

Not really. I think you're making a mountain out of a molehill here. The whole manner in which Jesus is the image of the invisible God is that He is God made visible, a theme reinforced throughout the NT epistles. It's fair to say that in religious writings words do not necessarily have the clinical and precise scientific meanings we might attach to them.

Except that I think this subset is a null set.

quote:

---

In genesis when refering to God it says we. And why because God is three parts Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Jesus was around in the beginning Jesus is God so he did create cows.

---

I lean more to the view that this is a hangover from a polytheistic substratum to the Genesis myths - it also neatly explains why the name of God in Genesis 1 - Elohim - is technically a plural. Otherwise I'd expect this usage to continue through the OT.