Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   PHILOSOPHY IS KING
Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 123 (98034)
04-06-2004 2:13 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Cold Foreign Object
04-06-2004 12:16 AM


Violators have their "reciever" removed, they are no longer capable of seeing God's fingerprints in creation. They will conclude everything and anything BUT God.
You have posted this idea several times and each time you try to ignore Theistic Evolutionists. If a person still has their god sense then they should be able see his "fingerprints" in creation, right? Well, then how is it that we have people that still have their god sense accepting evolution?
Shouldn't these people that still have god sense reject evolution right out because they can see gods "fingerprints" all over the place?
Also your entire argument is based on the assumption that the god is a Christian one and that the bible is true. For all you know the one true god could be Islamic. Until some evidence is provided that suggests that god is Christian (or that he even exists) your arguments are worthless.
Everyone has opinions about the Divine, as it is silly to say these opinions cease at the laboratory door. They continue under the camouflage of code because otherwise scientism/evolutionism is making unqualified conclusions about God.
The idea that nearly all scientists are working together to deny creation is ridiculous. In order for this to be true you would need thousands of scientists (if not millions) in dozens of fields working and communicating in unison with each other to cover up all evidence contradictory to evolution. Essentially what you are suggesting is that there is a massive conspiracy among scientists to cover up "the truth"
Lastly, I'm not sure where you got the idea that evolution denies gods existence. Anyone that says that the TOE disproves god doesn't know what they are talking about. The only thing the TOE goes against is the Genesis account of creation, this does not mean that god had no hand in creation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 04-06-2004 12:16 AM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 04-07-2004 12:36 AM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

  
Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member


Message 114 of 123 (109130)
05-18-2004 7:46 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Cold Foreign Object
05-18-2004 7:28 PM


I feel compelled to bring up the invisible pink unicorns....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 05-18-2004 7:28 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 123 (109904)
05-22-2004 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by Cold Foreign Object
05-19-2004 2:35 PM


Re: this prophet's gone to heaven
It doesn't matter for me BECAUSE I know Jesus is God. This makes all other "competing" religions riddled with error.
Then why are you even here? I am here to learn about and try to understand other people's beliefs. And to a lesser degree show them what the evidence really supports. But, if you are here simply to try to prove other people wrong regardless of what evidence they have against you, why don't you head over to one of the Christian forums and preach your philosophy to them? Surely they will be easier to persuade.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 05-19-2004 2:35 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 05-22-2004 8:58 PM Rand Al'Thor has replied

  
Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member


Message 123 of 123 (109933)
05-22-2004 10:33 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by Cold Foreign Object
05-22-2004 8:58 PM


Re: this prophet's gone to heaven
In other words, a christian with a made up mind, a person who has progressed past agnosticism bothers you.
No, not really. What bothers me is when a person refuses to admit even the possibility that they are wrong. I have no problem with you having your mind made up, but to claim that there are no other possibilities is just arrogant.
I am here to also try and present what I believe the evidence really supports.
That is the problem, you have not show any evidence.
Then you are saying my position has been proven wrong. What evidence are you talking about?
No, in this particular thread I do not think your position has been falsified. (Nor has it been proven either) But, I have seen you debate in other threads in which you simply dismissed evidence because it contradicted you.
Your mind is wide open except to christianity.
What makes you say this? I am an atheist, to me NO religion has provided enough evidence to be considered true. But I am not so arrogant to say that my beliefs are the only right ones.
I don't recall your participation, except to ambiguously criticize drive-by style.
I suppose this is true, I've be tending to lurk recently, I only really post when I have a lot of free time.
Willowtree, you only irritate me to a slight degree, in fact I think you are one of the better creo posters that we have on EvC. The people that truly irritate me are people like whatever or 14-gripper.
And I do agree with you, EvC is the best debate forum on the net.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 05-22-2004 8:58 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024