PHILOSOPHY IS KING

I guess I like to see this as similar to a child. Although the embryo eventually becomes a fully grown human, the adult has came about via a seemingly and totally natural means. At first it is a tiny package of cells, and look at the end product. But no-one says that we are not designed or created by God in the believers camp,(me included). So although there seems to be no Godly interaction and science has explained the womb happenings, we do not conclude no God and so if we evolved via natural means, why then should we conclude no God? We can still be designed, maybe God makes us in tiny packages, and the universe in a tiny package. If I design a car and build the prototype then it doesn't mean there is no creator/designer if I am not involved in every production of that model. If evolution is true then it just means God is cleverer than I thought.

But aren't you the people who suggest it is 66 seperate books, in which Esther is now not supposedly part of it? If they are all seperate, then information in the bible CAN confirm itself IF the books are seperate.Migraine is caused by an evolutionistic worldview and ant-biblism.