PHILOSOPHY IS KING

You are misrepresenting the facts.The truth is that you failed to provide adequate evidence - and ignored evidence to the contrary.You quote cranks like Velikovsky, Milton and the various "Pyramid prophecy" types and expect us to beleive them - while calling the experts liars.That's why you lose time and time again. Just quoting someone who says something you happen to like proves nothing - especially when they are not credible sources. Even more so when it appears that you have misrepresented even their views as shown in your retreat from your "Resurrection" thread.In short you judge everything on your own strong prejudices and get upset when people don't come to the same conclusions you do.

And you're the one misrepresenting and ignoring facts..Or perhaps you would like to reference the post where I denied that the Earth was round - or anything close to equivalent.

I only repeated your own words.The fact is of course that you did not produce any significant evidence. The fact is that you ignored the problems with your evidence. The fact is that you ignored relevant evidence - such as Tacitus' statement that the persecution under Nero was about the Great Fire for which the Christians were blamed.Lets face it, the apostles were obscure figures whose lives and deaths left little real evidence. We don't know really know how or even where most of them died, let alone the details of their deaths. The evidence for your claims isn;t there, it never was there and trying to pretend otherwise is just continuing the lie.

Is post 107 in this thread to which this is a reply.There are plenty of others - such as my last reply to you in the Resurrection thread. I supposed embarassment at having been caught questioning something you yourself had said played a part in that one.