Conflict of interests

Its quite interesting that the evolutionist theory rests on the dating of a rock to date the age of the fossil, imprint, etc...I have no problem with rocks dating old (who cares)(God always was)(its all about the age of the fossils)(When did the genesis event occur), the problem appears to be the delusion evolutionist believe, that they can date a rock to date the age when the fossil was imprinted, the age of the fossil, since TOE is just based off this assumption, its time to replace TOE and embrace the ID which is based on facts, and not delusions, etc...Like ID and TOE agree on micro-evolution, and all the other basics, its quite obvious that its a common creator, not a common ancestor, and TOE should be laid to rest, so the religion of secular humanism, is not being taught to our children as if its fact, when its obvious the Evolutionists are not dating the fossil imprint, fossil, but the age of the sediments that imprinted the fossil, buried the fossil, etc...

Crash, The bible says all lifes substances were destroyed that remained on the earths surface during the biblical flood, this supports your imprint, whose substances were imprinted beneath the biblical sediments of the world flood deluge of the Genesis Biblical Flood, that said these fossils were destroyed, for which is the fossil record, etc...P.S. Its quite hard to preserve fossils, if they are not buried by sediments, as the sediments solidify, why would not the fossil be entombed within the sediments, they are not going anywhere, they became pressed into the fossil imprints, etc...Its no different than when someone is buried in a coffin, your saying the person in the coffin(fossil)is the same age as the sediments that surrounds the coffin, TOE Makes no sense, when you think of it in context, which is why its time to replace TOE with ID, etc...