Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   No Gospel without Law, no Mercy without Wrath
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 50 of 301 (238122)
08-28-2005 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Faith
08-27-2005 11:39 PM


Re: Obedience to the Law
Hi Faith,
Would you be kind and present those MORAL laws you describe? If you could either paraphrase all those you can or give me the verses where I can find them, I'd appreciate it.
I'm still confused on which are the ceremonial and/or dietary laws. If you could just provide the moral laws for right now, I'd be grateful.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Faith, posted 08-27-2005 11:39 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by Faith, posted 08-29-2005 2:45 AM DBlevins has replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 129 of 301 (238481)
08-30-2005 1:55 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Faith
08-29-2005 2:45 AM


Re: Obedience to the Law
Thank you.
Are all the 10 commandments equal in the eyes of God? If so, what is the punishment for breaking one of them?
Is it up to God to punish or should believers set out punishment?
I assume that many believers hold that the US's laws should reflect a more 'biblical' approach if we as a nation want to avoid God's wrath?
If so, how do you feel punishent should be approached?
Feel free to answer in the spirit of this OP. I didn't want to be rude and take things too far off topic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Faith, posted 08-29-2005 2:45 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by Faith, posted 08-30-2005 3:35 AM DBlevins has not replied
 Message 133 by Faith, posted 08-30-2005 4:01 AM DBlevins has replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 130 of 301 (238482)
08-30-2005 2:15 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by DominionSeraph
08-29-2005 2:20 PM


positive reinforcement
Parents use negative reinforcement so the child associates that behavior with pain; and as humans try to avoid pain, anything that causes pain is likewise avoided.
I hope I'd be corrected if i'm wrong but corporal punishment is actually "positive" reinforcement. "Negative" reinforcement would be the subtraction of something. (ex. Positive reinforcement would be the 'addition' of a stimulus for an action, while 'negative' would be the removal of a stimulus.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by DominionSeraph, posted 08-29-2005 2:20 PM DominionSeraph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by DominionSeraph, posted 08-30-2005 7:40 AM DBlevins has not replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 178 of 301 (239321)
09-01-2005 1:03 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by Faith
08-30-2005 4:01 AM


Re: Obedience to the Law
Thank you for your reply, but I am still curious about what you think about my question concerning the 10 commandments.
Are all the 10 commandments equal in the eyes of God? If so, what is the punishment for breaking one of them?
Is it up to God to punish or should believers set out punishment?
I assume that many believers hold that the US's laws should reflect a more 'biblical' approach if we as a nation want to avoid God's wrath?
If so, how do you feel punishent should be approached?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Faith, posted 08-30-2005 4:01 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 215 by Faith, posted 09-01-2005 6:12 PM DBlevins has replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 220 of 301 (239856)
09-02-2005 3:15 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by Faith
09-01-2005 6:12 PM


Re: Obedience to the Law
So we deserve the wrath of God if we don't follow any of the 10 commandments? This wrath condemming us to eternal fire, brimstone, etc.?
If I worship another God or make a graven image of God or take God's name in vain I would need to be saved through Jesus Christ?
umm, yet regardless of how well I treat others or treat others with the respect they deserve, I am condemmed?
The justification for all this eternal death stuff and the "thou shall not...", is that God loves us?
{edited for clarity}
This message has been edited by DBlevins, 09-02-2005 03:18 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by Faith, posted 09-01-2005 6:12 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 222 by iano, posted 09-02-2005 5:26 AM DBlevins has replied
 Message 223 by Faith, posted 09-02-2005 7:49 AM DBlevins has not replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 249 of 301 (240128)
09-02-2005 10:40 PM
Reply to: Message 222 by iano
09-02-2005 5:26 AM


Re: Obedience to the Law
The justification is simply that God is just.
However, the standard God measures you by is his standard, not yours. And this of course makes sense. If everybody was measured by their own standard then what is the standard?
We earn death.
point is that you are not able to follow Gods laws - any of them.
The way to see it is that we are all already on a free-fall to condemnation. We were born that way.
Wow...This seems like the perfect religion for me. Lots of love there.[/sarcasm off]
We are born in condemnation, we have no way to follow god's laws, yet he is desribed as just, and by his own standards, we earn death.
What about the standard that says do good to others as you would want them to do for you? Why isn't this a justifiable standard for existence and life? Laws that are by nature impossible to conform to, ARE NOT JUST. You would have to be seriously brainwashed to believe it is your own damn fault for being born and immediatly condemmed to death.
What a racket this sounds like. Some judge just has to tell you your guilty when you were born, you then have to worship him or die eternally and horribly, so he can forgive you. Oh yeh, don't forget the tithes. You actually pay the poeple who work for the judge so you can continue feeling/being guilty.
I have to wonder why MY standard is not good enough? I may be human and make mistakes but I should not be judged to eternal death because I spoke i'll of this judgemental god who decides arbitrarily to murder women and children because his followers want their land. Nice guy he sounds like.
What a crock of BS to believe that the gift of eternal life is freely given. BS! Freely given IF you worship. This gift is extortion. Either believe or you will die by hellfire.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 222 by iano, posted 09-02-2005 5:26 AM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 253 by Phat, posted 09-03-2005 12:03 AM DBlevins has replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 250 of 301 (240130)
09-02-2005 10:48 PM
Reply to: Message 238 by Faith
09-02-2005 4:26 PM


Re: Ancient primitive mentality or modern prejudice?
This animistic kind of thinking IS typical of primitive people, but it is far from the mentality you find in the Bible. Nothing about God in that story. In fact, although there are vague references to a Great-Spirit-like God in some tribal religions, the usual religion is ancestor worship and local gods and forms of animism along the lines of this tribe. The Bible is SO far above these TRULY primitive kinds of thinking there is no comparison, and it comments ON these common beliefs also. The Bible is the reason the Western world transcended that kind of primitive thinking. How sad to see arrogant moderns accusing it of the same thing.
And what you said is called "ethnocentrism".
In short, the idea that ones world view is better or greater or of more value than anothers.
If natural disaster destroys a church, however, or a nation for that matter, the church should take it as a reason to reconsider how they are teaching and living the gospel in my opinion, and the nation should repent as Nineveh did.
And how is that different from some group that believes in a hungry ocean, pray tell?
This is what many call "magical" or "supernatural" thinking.
The Bible writers are wise level-headed realistic people.
And you would know this how? You mean you actually held a conversation with one or more of them? Wow.
How can you seriously think that we could take your word on the supposed sanity or mentality of long dead writers? Jesus sounds to me like he had feelings of "supernatural" powers and charismatic bouts of euphoria attributed by other to be indications of "powers". Sounds just like many "shamans" you may meet in the world.
The fact that so many were involved in writing it over so many centuries helps to guarantee that reliability.
That statement is unsupportable and is in fact contrary to observed instances of transmitted histories. They ALL get distorted somehow or other.
No, I'm afraid God really did do those things, and they are supposed to be taken by us as knowledge of the consequences of sin.
That makes god the biggest terrorist of them all.
Other "historically" presented accounts were likely not wwritten by those who actually experienced them. Factual archeological evidence suggests that the Exodus as described in the Bible never happened (there is no evidence of a 40 year trek through the desert - even smaller nomadic groups leave evidence behind, and the numbers suggested by the Bible are huge).
After 3000 years you expect evidence to remain, though many other nomadic groups have come and gone since then? Remarkable. What? Quail bones? A pellet of manna?
Yet you expect us to believe YOUR evidence is perfect and should be taken litteral? Just pointing out a glaring inconsistency.
Yet, evidence exists in many areas in which humans lived. Food remains can be found in many archaeological sites, especially bones. Cloth remains more than 7000 years old have been found. It all depends on the level of preservation due to climate and environmental factors. Much of evidence obtained does not follow the bible as Rhavin stated and as far as I am aware in the majority of events described in the bible, there is no evidence. Though evidence exists of humans, it doesn't match what the bible says.
Amazing what modern people prefer to believe based on scanty recently acquired evidence over a witness account from the time. The ancient people would laugh at us.
Until we have the evidence the witness is suspect. Amazing how little you require to believe in magic and demons.
The striking thing about the Bible as a whole is its utter lack of literary embellishments of history.
Surprising how close the Enuma Elish compares to the genesis accounts of creation. Of course, the Enuma Elish predates the biblical account. It seems likely that early jewish writers came into contact with the powerful story of the babylonians and thought "Wow, we gotta include this, but lets embelish it a bit and make our god sound better." (Reminds me of Bush and his cronies on the road to war with Iraq. Hmm, I think we need to make this evidence sound more better. This message has been edited by DBlevins, 09-02-2005 11:26 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 238 by Faith, posted 09-02-2005 4:26 PM Faith has not replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 251 of 301 (240142)
09-02-2005 11:45 PM
Reply to: Message 248 by jar
09-02-2005 10:16 PM


Re: True Love versus Counterfeit Love
I've given the true gospel many times on this thread, and your version of the gospel, I'm sorry to say, is the same sort of soothing false words the devil spoke to Eve, and that the false prophets told Israel, that bad things would not happen to them.
Sounds like faith is saying your possessed by a demon there Jar.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 248 by jar, posted 09-02-2005 10:16 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 252 by Phat, posted 09-02-2005 11:51 PM DBlevins has replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 255 of 301 (240164)
09-03-2005 1:08 AM
Reply to: Message 252 by Phat
09-02-2005 11:51 PM


Re: True Love versus Counterfeit Love
Thanks for the reply.
I have to admit I have a hard time understanding fundementalists (Western Christian mindset?). While Jar's view, to me, is much more "enlightened."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by Phat, posted 09-02-2005 11:51 PM Phat has not replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 256 of 301 (240166)
09-03-2005 1:12 AM
Reply to: Message 253 by Phat
09-03-2005 12:03 AM


Re: Obedience to the Law
My point to Iano and faith is that what they describe as a gift freely given seems more like extortion to me. Worship me or I'm gonna kick your butt.
The idea of original sin is screwy to me. <--You're screwed no matter what because of what your parents did. Doesn't seem like justice to me.
This message has been edited by DBlevins, 09-03-2005 01:13 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 253 by Phat, posted 09-03-2005 12:03 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 259 by iano, posted 09-03-2005 6:50 AM DBlevins has replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 275 of 301 (240278)
09-03-2005 3:11 PM
Reply to: Message 259 by iano
09-03-2005 6:50 AM


Re: Obedience to the Law
iano writes:
point is that you are not able to follow Gods laws - any of them.
The way to see it is that we are all already on a free-fall to condemnation. We were born that way.
iano writes:
We earn death.
iano writes:
It is in fact: "Your sin deserves to be punished and punish your sin I will(because I am just). But because I love you I've found a way not to have to punish you - because I have supplied an alternative means whereby justice, may be done. I've punished Jesus instead of you"
You have slipped past the point I have been trying to convey to you. If god is just, then why is it that we are guilty as soon as we are born? If he is just, then why is it impossible for us to follow his laws? That is NOT just. His laws, described as perfect and just, have quite a bit of extortion in them. The commandment about idolatry, taking his name in vain, worship me on the sabbath all point toward a god who is not only an extortionist but also has an inferiority complex. If we don'f follow his laws, which in fact you say are impossible to follow, we are condemmed to eternal death.
The gift is NOT freely given. It is extortion.
iano writes:
We sin because we are infected with this disease that makes it impossible not to sin. But it's not our disease that will be punished, you can't punish a disease. It's our sin that will be punished. God didn't infect man with the disease. Man infected himself
How can I take you seriously when you can't even recognize when you are being punished. You have a disease that you are infected with when you are born and you are condemmed for it. Obviously man is being punished for a disease he can't control. God is a royal (insert discriptive expletive).
{edited to add another responce}
This message has been edited by DBlevins, 09-03-2005 03:16 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by iano, posted 09-03-2005 6:50 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 279 by iano, posted 09-03-2005 5:05 PM DBlevins has replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 283 of 301 (240299)
09-03-2005 6:23 PM
Reply to: Message 279 by iano
09-03-2005 5:05 PM


Re: Obedience to the Law
A guilty verdict (and it is the only on possible for all who are not in Christ) comes from the sin we commit.
And you just wrote that we are immediatly guilty when we are born. Nothing has been committed. We are born that way, according to you.
Why didn't God do it another way?. No one knows but given what HE had to suffer, I think it's safe to say that if there had been another way to achieve his goal ( given that he is omnipotent) then he would have done it.
Just as an aside, if he is omnipotent then he would be all powerful. If he is unable to do something he is not omnipotent.
IOW, the purpose of the law is to make you realise that you CANNOT keep the law. That's all. Gods intention is for people to go "hang on, Gods law is perfect and I can't keep the law -heck!! That means I go to hell!!" If a person thinks Gods law is stupid or extortion etc., then they won't realise this. But if they truly come to see Gods law as being good and right then they will get that shock. And that exclaimation was precisely what God intended his laws to achieve. Not salvation - just "Heck!!"
Because it's at that point that a person may turn to the only person who can fulfill the law that they themselves can't. Someone who fulfulls it for them. His name is Jesus Christ. He said "I am the way and the truth and the light, NO ONE comes to the Father, except through me." By fulfilling Gods laws on our behalf, this is how Jesus brings us to God.
What part of extortion are you not getting? This is extortion. The only way to heaven is by worshipping me, because you failed to follow my law that says worship me. In other words, worship me or I kick your butt.
IOW, the purpose of the law is to make you realise that you CANNOT keep the law. <----That despot.
Man cannot help but sin - but the only sin man commits is sin he choses to. We all have a conscience. We all know what we ought to do. We chose to ignore our consciences. Every sin we commit is due to our choice.
Do you not see the inherent contradiction here?? We can't help but sin but on the other hand we choose to?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 279 by iano, posted 09-03-2005 5:05 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 289 by iano, posted 09-04-2005 1:05 PM DBlevins has replied

DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3805 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 294 of 301 (240475)
09-04-2005 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 289 by iano
09-04-2005 1:05 PM


Deliberately obtuse or what?
I don't think you are equivocating, I think you are being deliberatly obtuse!
Where did I write that we are guilty the moment we are born? We are infected from birth, thus we are all sinners and we will all die of this disease - babies and adults alike. Judgement however refers to sin committed (omission or commission). To commit a sin one needs to have an active conscience (knowledge of the law) in order to be able to disobey the law (sin). Sin needs to be seen as a disease (you are a sinner) and a consequence of disease. (you commit sin)
I have to wonder if you sit there and write this with a straight face? You tell me that we are born in sin and that the wages of sin are death and that if you don't accept jesus you are condemmed to eternal death...etc. Now, how is that not being guilty as soon as you're born? You wrote it!
Whether you think sin is some disease or not is irrelevant. It is obvious that your concept precludes that we are guilty when born.
It would be evil if the law wasn't good.
Okay we could debate the particulars but do you not think that they are good?
YOU are the one who stated that the purpose of the law was for us to realize we are unable to keep it. That is plainly evil. Making a law that is unable to be kept is evil. How can you not understand this? Perhaps you require an analogy?
As far as the particulars, I was just starting with the 10 commandments? How is it not extortion to tell someone to worship them or you'll kill them? How is that NOT evil???
quote:
As much as I would like the idea of omnipotence is off topic in my view
As far as love is concerned, how is telling your son or daughter that you will kill them if they don't love you not EVIL?
We chose to because we hate God.
The difference is that man hates God without reason. God has done nothing to man that man didn't bring on himself. God gave man one command and a choice...and a stern warning (for his own good). Man chose to disobey God. Its mans fault that it became the way it became - not Gods.
I don't know anyone who would say that they "hate" the idea of god by itself. If he were a just and kindly being, why would I. But I have to ask, where do you come from? There may be plenty of reasons to hate the god of the bible. He kills wantonly, he is a liar and a thief. He is a lustful old goat who takes anothers wife to beget his own child. Sounds like a lot of Elites throughout history. The god of the bible is plainly despotic, and has human emotions/needs/desires/faults. Hmm, think he could be a product of human imagination?
A WWII Luftwaffe pilot not only cannot help shooting down US planes. He hates them and thus choses to do it with all his might.
Are you seriously contending that every military person hates the enemy during war? While they may be trained and indoctorinated to feel enemity toward the enemy and many may feel hatred when they see their friends or family die, I would have to disagree that this is the case for all. I have read many accounts of military personnel just recounting that they had a job to do, that they were trained to do. In fact, many had to train themselves to supress the idea that the things they shot at had humans in them or were humans.
(whilst relying on others to follow them, to offset what would happen if no one did - anarchy).
It is obvious that human societies have been able to do quite well WITHOUT god and his commandments. The legal systems we have are rules built by societies. We don't and didn't need god to tell us what is just. We do quite well enough without him, thank you very much.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 289 by iano, posted 09-04-2005 1:05 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 295 by iano, posted 09-05-2005 8:13 AM DBlevins has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024