|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 5938 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: ramifications of omnipotence for God | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
sidelined writes:
how boring to have kids that never have a personality!
I would be interested in finding out just where the line is drawn by people of faith concerning what God can accomplish.Phat writes: Need there even be a line? Can God create all men with the capability of free will and obedience to him? If not why not? Surely this is not something which God could not do since that would mean that god is not omnipotent. Yet if God can do such then why does he not do so?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Jon writes: Actually I believe thats how He did create us. We have the free will and yet we have an inner unction to obey truth. Its just a matter of discovering for ourselves (and being guided also) into what that truth is.
You still have to answer: "if God can...create all men with the capability of free will and obedience to him...then why does he not do so?"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Rrhain writes: This brings up some great hypothetical questions and scenarios. You're missing the point: If there is evil and it can be stopped but the one who is capable of stopping it is unwilling to do so, then that person is also evil. There's an old saying: The only thing necessary for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing. I could go off on several tangents in discussing this stuff.
Lets engage in a hypothesis which asserts that a God could be real. For the sake of argument, we would first have to agree on the characteristics of this God. For now, lets assume foreknowledge and interaction with all creation at some point in our lives. Thus, hypothetically, believers and non-believers all will interact with said Deity. Are we ok so far? Now we come to your assertion:
Rrhain writes: I have no answers to this one, except to say that I believe God is capable of ultimate foreknowledge yet chooses to allow for human decision to determine ultimate destiny. Thus, God hypothetically leaves some foreknowledge open...awaiting our responses. So which is it? Is god willing or unwilling? Capable or incapable? Now on to my scenario and belief: Hypothetically, Gods foreknowledge is never evil if it involves my decisions. We could even go so far as to say that evil as an abstract reality exists, yet is never a personified reality unless chosen. I have participated in a few of these hypothetical arguments which basically state that IF God exists, (premise 1) and if there are two groups of people...the saved and the damned, (premise 2)and IF God foreknows which people will end up damned (premise 3) then this God is of necessity evil for fore knowingly creating damned people. Can you agree with me that my premise is OK so far? Now... Many Christians will resort to standard replies to this line of questions and hypothetical situations. Here is one:
You may counter that by saying that this God would still foreknow who would actually end up damned or lost, or even stubbornly defiant in the name of rationality and freedom. You would say that the Bible was not a trustworthy book and that if you ended up damned because of it, this God of the ignorant Christians would not be worth worshiping, trusting, or loving anyway. Right? My point is that you, or I, or anyone else would only have a right to call this God evil if we ourselves were never given a chance to meet Him. We simply do not yet possess enough information to do otherwise. It is irrelevant if this God foreknows that we will end up damned only if we are not given our day in court with such a Creator. Would you be prepared to argue that such a God is still evil if He judges us based solely on our desire to be independent?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Jon writes: Sure. Why place limits on God? Perhaps a followup question would be Will God do everything that He is capable of doing and that He feels "needs" doing if humans have freewill veto power? So then you agree that God can do anything at all that He feels needs doing? Evidently we humans in general are not seriously convinced of Gods overall omnipotence. We even choose to wave His existence off all together! Thankfully, God foreknew our stubborn independent streak, and is gracious enough to let us grow up and make a go at our lives without His almighty meddling. (Now if only we can teach this Holy example to the Religious Right! )
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
I can only conclude several things:
We can't simply call God evil for refusing to change our freely chosen destinies now, can we? (Even if we called Him evil, it wouldn't change anything except to leave a bitter feeling in our guts as we died an unglorious death.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Asgara writes: Of course. The way that I see it, however, is that the only people who insist that God must be evil for foreknowing their eventual demise are the people who simply refuse to acknowledge God as God in the first place. You have discussed this exact thing numerous times and you still can't make the distinction? The argument is really a non-argument as we have no actual case studies to follow through the portal of time. All we have to work with are hypothetical scenarios. My fallback position is that anyone with half a brain would never allow themselves to cling to their cherished freewill if they had any unction that God existed and did not approve. If they did, the blame would not be on God for foreknowing creating them as stubborn. (Of course this leads to the question of why God then allowed freewill in the first place if there were to be conditions attached to it! )
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18351 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
I writes: We can't simply call God evil for refusing to change our freely chosen destinies now, can we? rhain writes: We can if he could have done something about it. That's the point: We are not now talking about Adam and Eves dilemma. We are talking about our own relationship with this God of the Bible. You have, of course, declared that your God is not the Christian God. Thus, I cannot comment on your relationship. I can get an inkling by your response, however. To Wit:
Rrhain writes: *pause* We will die a glorious death on our terms, not the terms of evil.Are you saying that you have the right and power to not only micromanage your life but to in fact micromanage your death? If so, where does God fit in? As an unbiased observer? Kinda strips Him of His omnipotent quality. I suppose He did give you freewill, however...so who am I to quibble? I guess I am not a Calvinist. They maintain that God had to give me the ability to acknowledge Him I suppose that spiritually I could micromanage my decision to surrender to Him, as I would undoubtedly surrender upon physical death, anyway.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024