Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The ulitmate sin: blasphemy against the Holy Ghost
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 61 of 134 (173669)
01-04-2005 4:42 AM
Reply to: Message 60 by berberry
01-04-2005 2:57 AM


Re: No more games
*snickers*
as someone who is very very bad at proof-reading my own posts, and often leaves out words and forgets to add an s to plurals... that was pretty funny.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by berberry, posted 01-04-2005 2:57 AM berberry has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 62 of 134 (173670)
01-04-2005 4:49 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by commike37
01-03-2005 11:19 PM


2. Go back to name-calling again
quote:
Main Entry: bigot
Pronunciation: 'bi-g&t
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle French, hypocrite, bigot
: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices
deal with it.
want a better debate?
quote:
Mat 5:32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.
quote:
Lev 20:10 And the man that committeth adultery with [another] man's wife, [even he] that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death.
why pick and chose from the bible? i think the federal government should kill people who get divorced, don't you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by commike37, posted 01-03-2005 11:19 PM commike37 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by commike37, posted 01-04-2005 4:16 PM arachnophilia has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1374 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 93 of 134 (174237)
01-05-2005 9:33 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by commike37
01-04-2005 4:16 PM


Re: 2. Go back to name-calling again
Well, bigot tends to have a very negative connotation (moreso than ignorant), especially since the definition uses the words 'intolerantly' and 'prejudices'.
i would call discrimination on the basis of sexuality both intolerant and prejudiced.
As for the question posed by strictly enforcing the Bible, Judeo-Christian heritage exists in the federal concept of marriage, but not at a level of 100%.
what about polygamy? the patriarchs all did it, and tended to impregnate their wive's handmaidens while they were at it. lots of culture practiced monogamy, and the ancient jews don't appear to be one of them.
also, for future reference, there is no FEDERAL concept of marriage. marriage licenses and these laws are all at the state level.
(as that would totally undermine separation of church and state)
and promoting intolerant laws because your religion doesn't like a certain kind of person doesn't?
(of course, that assumes that the Bible is against homosexual marriage, but we won't get in depth on that one since that would get a bit off-topic).
find me a verse from the bible condemning lesbians.
edit: Also, the verse from Leviticus shouldn't be used.
then i move that we strike this one as well:
quote:
Lev 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it [is] abomination.
We don't live under the Law of the Old Testament (or God's Old Covenant with his people), we know live under the grace of Jesus Christ (or the New Covenant), which empowers us to do that which is right. You don't see any church strictly enforcing all of the codes in Leviticus today, do you?
*yawn*
quote:
Mat 5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets
Also, read the story about the adulteress who Jesus saved from a stoning and forgave. That's a very simple explanation (almost over-simplified).
so, should the government punish the adulteress? should they outlaw adultery? can you truly regulate morality, and if you can does it have any meaning if do?
the bible and the constitution are different documents, and should remain so.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by commike37, posted 01-04-2005 4:16 PM commike37 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024