Just curious, I haven't seen the "Exodus Revealed"...but I probably will. My curiousity lies in the significance of a "proposed substantiation--not proof of the particular details of an exodus which can not be denied--other than in the details. Regardless, any good "thinker" can counter loosely strung circumstances with an also acceptable explanation. Why is this important?...does anyone debate the historical reality of an exodus?...I think not. What is debated over and over in this forum and elsewhere is the sensibility(credibility) of biblical text in modern times. It does not take a scientist to realize the Bible is-- at best--a mediocre history book and clearly not the word of a "deity". The facts of its origination alone correspond to the development of our own constitution. A bunch of leaders got together and wrote a "one for all" document/book to be placed in all the RC churches. However, in both cases...the basic flaw still exists...humans will never completely agree as to whatis right or wrong for everyone.I was saved at age five but figured that out by age ten, too!
Sorry, no true answers on this one.