Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Missing sea creatures
MiguelG
Member (Idle past 2006 days)
Posts: 63
From: Australia
Joined: 12-08-2004


Message 7 of 85 (176354)
01-12-2005 7:53 PM


Nit-Picking and the Bible
Thor: However if, as I believe, the Bible is nothing more than the writings of men inspired by nothing more divine than their own exceptional imagination (possibly enhanced by smoking some serious ganja), then forgetting so many creatures is understandable.
A third explanation would be that as the Biblical authors were men, regardless of their divine inspiration, their understanding was limited by their individual knowledge, wisdom, and cultural mores & biases.
Lam: One of the few facts that creos and evos agree on is that the bible ain't a science textbook.
I wish that were so generally speaking. Many creationists seem to think it is and offer reams of biblical quotes as proof of that.
In fact, some even go so far as to say that if any scientific fact contradicts the Bible, then science must be wrong!
Lam: To use modern way of thinking on something as ancient as Genesis is simply silly, oh great god of the Norse.
I would agree with you there.
That's precisely why 'creation science' in its many forms does not belong in either the lab or classroom, based as it is on the ancient creation myths of a pre-scientific culture.
Cheers

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024