Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy ⇒

The Inerrancy of the Bible

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Inerrancy of the Bible
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4174 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 76 of 301 (176980)
01-14-2005 11:37 AM 		Reply to: Message 73 by johnfolton
01-14-2005 10:59 AM

Hi Tom:
​
People keep pointing out errors in the text and you keep coming up with excuses. Maybe you are looking at it from a different perspective. Is it your contention that it is the message of the KJV that is inerrant, not necessarily the typed text? Of course, this also makes the whole idea meaningless.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 10:59 AM johnfolton has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 12:20 PM FliesOnly has replied
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4174 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 82 of 301 (177006)
01-14-2005 12:36 PM 		Reply to: Message 80 by johnfolton
01-14-2005 12:20 PM

So........you are agreeing that the KJV is not inerrant.
​
(I think my previous post may have said "Inherent"...sorry (ABE: nope, I just looked))
​
This message has been edited by FliesOnly, 01-14-2005 12:38 AM
​
This message has been edited by FliesOnly, 01-14-2005 12:38 AM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 12:20 PM johnfolton has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 85 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 1:39 PM FliesOnly has replied
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4174 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 89 of 301 (177026)
01-14-2005 2:30 PM 		Reply to: Message 85 by johnfolton
01-14-2005 1:39 PM

Re: Prophecy is Inerrant!
Hi Tom:
​
Tom writes:
​
Flies only, That depends on how you define Inerrant.
Well, I define it as without errors.
​
It appears that you define it as without errors, except where it is mistaken.
​
It’s kinda like saying: I’m never wrong! I thought I was wrong oncebut I was mistaken.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 85 by johnfolton, posted 01-14-2005 1:39 PM johnfolton has not replied
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4174 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 171 of 301 (178212)
01-18-2005 2:25 PM 		Reply to: Message 170 by PaulK
01-18-2005 1:51 PM

Re: Some old chestnuts
And I think the truly scary part is that they really think they've answered the questions. They believe that their "explanatons" have addressed the errors. How that is possible, I do not know...Sad.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by PaulK, posted 01-18-2005 1:51 PM PaulK has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024