Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy ⇒

The Unacknowledged Accuracy of Genesis 1

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev12
Author Topic:   The Unacknowledged Accuracy of Genesis 1
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 215 of 302 (408467)
07-02-2007 11:08 PM 		Reply to: Message 214 by IamJoseph
07-02-2007 11:03 PM

Re: because the question posed was really stupid
My reading of 'kind' in genesis would be, as a minimum, the species sited in genesis (veg, fish, mammals, birds, animals, humans).
​
Like I said, the post is simply stupid and shows you are just playing kiddie games with made up definitions here just as in all your other posts.
​
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by IamJoseph, posted 07-02-2007 11:03 PM IamJoseph has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 218 by IamJoseph, posted 07-02-2007 11:33 PM jar has not replied
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 233 of 302 (408526)
07-03-2007 9:31 AM 		Reply to: Message 231 by Nimrod
07-03-2007 8:35 AM

Re: A little advice for the Creationist's posting
Just a hint.
​
The Topic is "The Unacknowledged Accuracy of Genesis 1".
​
Not Kings.
​
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by Nimrod, posted 07-03-2007 8:35 AM Nimrod has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 235 by IamJoseph, posted 07-03-2007 9:37 AM jar has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev12
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024