Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,895 Year: 4,152/9,624 Month: 1,023/974 Week: 350/286 Day: 6/65 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why Literal?
Peter
Member (Idle past 1507 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 11 of 120 (37804)
04-24-2003 6:08 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by booboocruise
04-24-2003 4:06 AM


The bible doesn't go against evolution ... your interpretation
of the Bible as literal truth is contrary to evolutionary
theory.
I had a religous studies teacher who pointed out that,
on the whole, the order of creation in Genesis Ch1. is consistent
with that accepted by mainstream science (some minor diffs.
perhaps). Only if it is taken literally is it contradictive.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by booboocruise, posted 04-24-2003 4:06 AM booboocruise has not replied

  
Peter
Member (Idle past 1507 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 92 of 120 (38411)
04-30-2003 6:29 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by crashfrog
04-30-2003 2:55 AM


Off-topic a bit -- sorry
Just as a matter of interest (sorry admins), if you feed
your pet rats too many nuts/seeds they overload on protein
and it can have quite severe negative health effects. You
will often notice a reddy-brown discharge from the nostrils
and in some cases eyes of a poorly rat ... this is a non-specific
response to stress and can be induced by too high a protein content
in the food.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by crashfrog, posted 04-30-2003 2:55 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by crashfrog, posted 04-30-2003 2:40 PM Peter has replied

  
Peter
Member (Idle past 1507 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 116 of 120 (38566)
05-01-2003 7:39 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by crashfrog
04-30-2003 2:40 PM


Re: Off-topic a bit -- sorry
I've never managed to get one passed about three, so anything
over that is good going in my book. Female rats are
more likely to develop tumours too. Over a period of about
5 years I had around 15 male rats and only 1 developed a
tumour, while a friend had about 8 females and five suffered
tumours that ultimately led to their demise.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by crashfrog, posted 04-30-2003 2:40 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024