Hi Ken,
Can I point out that the majority of your posts actually contain nothing that constitutes a debate.
We encourage members to construct their own arguments and post them here, you may use a link to support your argument, but you really should be presenting from that link what you believe are the important points.
Imagine this scenario.
You post a link to tektonics to represent your argument.
A member could reply by asking you to read their link to talkorigins.
This is not debating this is swapping links.
In future, if you want to use a link, perhaps you could post a few of the arguments from the page you are linking to in your post.
For example, you could say that J P Holding (or Robert Turkel) explains the mustard seed 'problem' by informing us that...... then include a quick summary of Holding's explanation. Then you could include the link and say that the full explanation is there.
Also, don't underestimate the amount of work that the non-believers here have done, many were Christians themselves and are very familiar with the 'apologetics' of people like the librarian Holding.
Finally, when you are typing out a reply to people you will notice underneath the typing area a button that has 'Preview'written on it.
Once you believe that you have finished your reply, hit the 'preview' button to check your post, if you are happy with it, then hit the submit button. This will avoid the long list of 'edited by' messages in most of your posts.
Thank you for your help.
AdminBrian.
[This message has been edited by AdminBrian, 01-15-2004]