hitchy
Member (Idle past 5148 days) Posts: 215 From: Southern Maryland via Pittsburgh Joined: 01-05-2004
|
|
Message 4 of 61 (78373)
01-14-2004 8:22 AM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by kendemyer
01-13-2004 7:50 PM
|
|
why do you feel the need to bring up biblical inerrancy? did you just have enough of the good hard factual evidence that contradicts the innerrancy of the bible. if one story is shown to be false, then the whole bible inerrancy position is false.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by kendemyer, posted 01-13-2004 7:50 PM | | kendemyer has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 5 by Phat, posted 01-14-2004 9:17 AM | | hitchy has replied |
|
hitchy
Member (Idle past 5148 days) Posts: 215 From: Southern Maryland via Pittsburgh Joined: 01-05-2004
|
|
Message 9 of 61 (78453)
01-14-2004 3:32 PM
|
Reply to: Message 5 by Phat
01-14-2004 9:17 AM
|
|
Re: Definition of Biblical Inerrency>>>
if you want to talk about the inerrancy of the bible, then you have to be talking about total inerrancy. if you are just talking about the inerrancy of the jesus story then please say so. i understand that a lot of people believe all of the new testament but don't put much into the accuracy of the OT. fine...anyway, if the bible is totally inerrant b/c it is supposed to be the word of god and all, then if one part is proven incorrect or inaccurate, i can say that it is not absolutely inerrant. so, you have to clarify what exactly you mean and want to defend.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 5 by Phat, posted 01-14-2004 9:17 AM | | Phat has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 10 by Newborn, posted 01-14-2004 4:24 PM | | hitchy has not replied |
|
hitchy
Member (Idle past 5148 days) Posts: 215 From: Southern Maryland via Pittsburgh Joined: 01-05-2004
|
|
|
Message 57 of 61 (79103)
01-17-2004 5:26 PM
|
Reply to: Message 56 by Newborn
01-17-2004 4:30 PM
|
|
nuts to newborn!
let me get this straight--i have to believe every single part of the bible to be saved. from stoning a bad child or adultering wife to being expected to kill my firstborn and only child to crucifying my own intellect when Earth tells me that she is definitely older than around 4000 years or when my genome tells me that there were more than two people around at that same time to ad naseum. you have surrounded me and are asking me to surrender. here is my reply-------"NUTS"
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 56 by Newborn, posted 01-17-2004 4:30 PM | | Newborn has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2