This is the tektonics pathetic 'reasoning' which I have read before.
Quite simply, the big back legs on the locust, etc. were not counted as "legs" in the same sense as the other legs
If you need child like excuses and feeble logic like this to maintain biblical inerrancy then seek medical attention.
This is nothing short of pathetic.
I can allow the bats vs. birds argument if you allow for the supposed meaning of 'winged things' as the translation and not just birds. But the grasshopper 4 legs because the big hind legs are not being counted is kindergarten level machinations.
A word of advice Kendemyer. Coming on EvC forum and mindlessly posting web links ad nauseum will result in an initial ass hole reaming followed by ignoring.
If posting tektonics links is the best you have got I suggest giving up.
I mean, do you apply the above logic to your day to day life or is it just for lunacy like defending biblical inerrancy (an indefensible position.)
There are so many errors in the Bible that to list them all results in a bigger text than the Bible. Spiritual guide yes, factual document at all times NO.
When a bloody grasshopper brings the whole inerrancy premise down in one swoop a new hobby is in order for the inerrancy pushers.
That's why I sarcastically said 'GAME OVER' - though it really never began to be truthful.