Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ring Species!!
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4451
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.0


Message 13 of 50 (503371)
03-18-2009 10:30 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by harry
03-15-2009 9:15 PM


Dragonfly Ring Species
There are a group of dragonflies in the genus Orthemis that appear to be a ring species. I am not sure if any papers have been published yet that document this fully, but a number of Odonate workers are studying it. These dragonflies are found from Florida, through the Caribbean, through northern South America, through Central America and Mexico, into Texas and across the southern states. One interesting thing is that several of the species in this complex have males with two or more color morphs.
Photos of some of the members of this complex can be seen at: http://www.ups.edu/x6318.xml

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by harry, posted 03-15-2009 9:15 PM harry has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by harry, posted 03-18-2009 4:16 PM Tanypteryx has not replied
 Message 15 by RAZD, posted 03-18-2009 8:23 PM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4451
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.0


Message 16 of 50 (503486)
03-19-2009 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by RAZD
03-18-2009 8:23 PM


Re: Dragonfly Ring Species
RAZD writes:
Wow. It seems you could logically have more than one "ring" involved (where a "ring" is the extent of change necessary for interbreeding to cease).
You are right, there could be more than one ring. This is one of the things that makes studying dragonflies (and many other insect orders) so exciting. Trying to unravel the relationships of these species complexes and their evolutionary history is what gives some of our lives meaning. The best part is....we never run out of new questions.*
Do you know if anyone has tried to breed intermediate hybrids?.
LOL!! As far as I know, no one has ever bred dragonflies. Dragonfly adults do not do well in captivity, although they might do alright in a large atrium. Usually Odonate species and sub-species have a number of barriers (visual cues, morphological features, behaviors) that prevent interbreeding. We do occasionally find hybrids, (coincidentally, I did the illustrations for a recently published paper on two damselfly hybrids) but no one knows if they are sterile or not. Dragonfly mating behavior is very complex and completely different from reproduction in all the other insect orders.
*The IDists/Creationist never get this! We don't care if they don't accept evolution. We are mostly too busy studying the evolution of our favorite groups of organisms to worry about them. In all the years they have been around they have not given us a single tool to help us study biology because the tool that actually works in the field or in the lab is the Theory of Evolution.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by RAZD, posted 03-18-2009 8:23 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Sky-Writing, posted 03-21-2009 6:23 PM Tanypteryx has replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4451
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.0


Message 21 of 50 (503747)
03-21-2009 7:20 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Sky-Writing
03-21-2009 6:23 PM


Re: Tools
Sky writes:
I doubt you be able to show that even ONE of these highly respected scientists were not believers in Supernatural Intelligent Design.
JOSEPH LISTER
LOUIS PASTEUR
ROBERT BOYLE
GEORGES CUVIER
HENRI FABRE
GREGOR MENDEL
LOUIS AGASSIZ
CAROLUS LINNAEUS
Those are the dead ones.
What is your point? What do they have to do with ring species and can you show that ANY of them WERE believers in Supernatural Intelligent Design?
And more to the point, did any of them give us any tools of Supernatural Intelligent Design that any scientists today are using?
As to the living, 90% of Geneticists will
tell you (one on one) that they also
believe in a Supernatural Intelligent Designer.
What do their religious beliefs have to do with science? Are they sequencing genes for Jesus or what?
If you don't like my numbers, you can change that to
10% and your statement will still be off base.
This convinces me that you are just pulling numbers out of your ass and probably have never even spoken to a Geneticist.
Plus they seem to have never experienced any stress in their lives, given that there is the smallest amount of variation in the fossil record and are a great example of an Immutable Species.
The fossil record is pretty good for Odonates (dragonflies & damselflies) and spans almost 400 million years. They show a VERY LARGE amount of variation and change over that period. Hundreds of species of fossil insects have been described and many thousands of species are living today. Dozens of un-described species are being discovered every year.
This makes them "uninteresting" to study.
How sad for you that your life is so boring. Fortunately for myself and hundreds of my colleges you are wrong!

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Sky-Writing, posted 03-21-2009 6:23 PM Sky-Writing has not replied

  
Tanypteryx
Member
Posts: 4451
From: Oregon, USA
Joined: 08-27-2006
Member Rating: 5.0


Message 30 of 50 (503766)
03-21-2009 10:30 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Sky-Writing
03-21-2009 10:00 PM


Re: Tools
So Yes, ID believers have given us tools
I ask what are those tools and what do they have to do with ID?
And no. The Theory of Evolution is a footnote in any "List of tools" for biology. "The Lab" deals with real testable results. Not theory that take millions of years to get results.
So, what is your definition of the process of evolution and the Theory of Evolution? If you want us to take your criticisms seriously we would like to know that you know what you are talking about.
Inherent variation, on the other hand, can be worked with in days and months. Ring Species is the study of current population variation and is proof of intelligent design rather than evolution.
I am not sure what you mean by inherent variation. Proof of intelligent design....well if YOU say so it must be true. Would you please explain this proof a little more fully? I see the Nobel Prize in your future.

What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Sky-Writing, posted 03-21-2009 10:00 PM Sky-Writing has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by harry, posted 03-21-2009 11:03 PM Tanypteryx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024