Sky writes:
I doubt you be able to show that even ONE of these highly respected scientists were not believers in Supernatural Intelligent Design.
JOSEPH LISTER
LOUIS PASTEUR
ROBERT BOYLE
GEORGES CUVIER
HENRI FABRE
GREGOR MENDEL
LOUIS AGASSIZ
CAROLUS LINNAEUS
Those are the dead ones.
What is your point? What do they have to do with ring species and can you show that ANY of them WERE believers in Supernatural Intelligent Design?
And more to the point, did any of them give us any
tools of Supernatural Intelligent Design that any scientists today are using?
As to the living, 90% of Geneticists will
tell you (one on one) that they also
believe in a Supernatural Intelligent Designer.
What do their religious beliefs have to do with science? Are they sequencing genes for Jesus or what?
If you don't like my numbers, you can change that to
10% and your statement will still be off base.
This convinces me that you are just pulling numbers out of your ass and probably have never even spoken to a Geneticist.
Plus they seem to have never experienced any stress in their lives, given that there is the smallest amount of variation in the fossil record and are a great example of an Immutable Species.
The fossil record is pretty good for Odonates (dragonflies & damselflies) and spans almost 400 million years. They show a
VERY LARGE amount of variation and change over that period. Hundreds of species of fossil insects have been described and many thousands of species are living today. Dozens of un-described species are being discovered every year.
This makes them "uninteresting" to study.
How sad for you that your life is so boring. Fortunately for myself and hundreds of my colleges you are wrong!
What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python
You can't build a Time Machine without Weird Optics -- S. Valley