Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Good Calories, Bad Calories, by Gary Taubes
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 69 of 451 (465605)
05-08-2008 1:02 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Percy
05-07-2008 8:13 PM


Re: Balanced Diets are Bunk
The difficulty you're having supporting your positions should not serve as an excuse for taking out your frustrations on me and Taubes.
The reason I am having difficulty is either:
(1) Taube doesn't document his work.
(2) You won't give me the cites.
You don't seem to understand the what Taube is doing.
If, in the text, he says something like, "Jones and Smith showed in 2004 that..." and that is the full extent of his documentation, how is that any different from my saying "Nope. Hannink and Liscum showed in 2007 that that is not the case."
How on earth is one to verify either assertion?
And I am not holding Taube to peer reviewed literature standards. Reputable popsci books use footnotes, references, and/or bibliographies. Just look at Brian Greene's The Elegant Universe.
If Taube does not document his work, how am I to track down the paper he pseudo cites to see if:
(1) he is quote mining
(2) he is misinterpreting the data
(3) the paper is published in a reputable journal
et cetera.
Furthermore, without a paper, I can't check the cites the paper uses to find more information of that specific phenomenon.
We've been over these two points before.
Percy, I guess I'm done with the bare assertions.
Weight loss, yes. I know that because I did the research to confirm it.
At higher caloric levels? With more saiety?
You need to document this.
You can't just assert something is true and fail to support your argument in a debate. And neither can Taube.
I need a starting point. I need a cite.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Percy, posted 05-07-2008 8:13 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 70 of 451 (465607)
05-08-2008 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Percy
05-07-2008 8:36 PM


Re: Balanced Diets are Bunk
Mayes and Botham 2004
Pubmed has no 2004 paper for either of these authors.
There is a 2000 paper, but it has nothing to do with carbs, TAG biosynthesis from carbs, insulin levels in the liver, or temporary storage of carb-derived TAGs.
The consumption of fat-enriched diets may alter the uptake and metabolism of chylomicron remnant cholesterol by the liver. To test this hypothesis, [3H]cholesterol-labelled chylomicron remnants derived from different dietary fats were studied in perfused livers both from rats fed on diets enriched in the corresponding fats and from rats fed on a low-fat diet. Livers from rats fed on each of the fat-enriched diets removed similar amounts (34-40%) of the [3H]cholesterol-labelled remnants added, whereas livers from rats fed on the low-fat diet removed significantly more labelled fish-oil and butter-fat remnants than olive-, maize- or palm-oil remnants. Significantly more remnant [3H]cholesterol was secreted into the perfusate HDL by livers from rats fed on the olive-oil, fish-oil and butter-fat diets when compared with those from rats fed on the low-fat diet or the maize-oil diet. Furthermore, the excretion of remnant [3H]cholesterol via the bile acid was increased by the olive-, maize-, palm- or fish-oil diets, and decreased by the butter-fat diet when compared with the low-fat diet, although the [3H]bile acid excreted remained less on saturated fat diets. This investigation shows that the hepatic uptake and subsequent metabolism of cholesterol from chylomicron remnants is influenced by the type of fat in the diet as well as the fatty acid composition of the particles themselves, and may help to explain some of the hyper- and hypocholesterolaemic effects of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids.
Paper.
There is a 1995 paper, but it has nothing to do with carbs, TAG biosynthesis from carbs, insulin levels in the liver, or temporary storage of carb-derived TAGs.
The hepatic metabolism of [1-14C]oleate- and [1,2-3H]cholesterol-dual-labelled chylomicron remnants derived from olive, corn, palm and fish oil and butter fat was compared by adding each lipoprotein separately to the perfusate of isolated livers from rats fed on a normal diet. Labelled remnants from butter fat and fish oil were removed more rapidly from the perfusate than remnants derived from olive, corn and palm oil. The oxidation of labelled remnant fatty acid from olive oil, fish oil or butter fat was four to seven times greater than that from corn and palm oil. Labelled fatty acid in fish oil remnants was incorporated into phospholipid significantly more efficiently than the labelled fatty acid in olive, corn or palm oil remnants, with butter fat giving an intermediate value. For all the remnants, there was a significant amount of hydrolysis of labelled esterified cholesterol by the liver which was dependent on the magnitude of hepatic uptake of each type of remnant. The recovery of remnant [3H]cholesterol label in the bile was 50% less with palm oil remnants than with all the other remnants studied. The results indicate that the fatty acid composition of chylomicron remnants has a major impact on their uptake and metabolism by the liver.
Paper.
Ditto for 1992, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1997, 1998 papers by these authors. Nothing to do with carbs, TAG biosynthesis from carbs, insulin levels in the liver, or temporary storage of carb-derived TAGs.
Berneis and Krauss 2002
Found it.
LDLs in humans comprise multiple distinct subspecies that differ in their metabolic behavior and pathologic roles. Metabolic turnover studies suggest that this heterogeneity results from multiple pathways, including catabolism of different VLDL and IDL precursors, metabolic remodeling, and direct production. A common lipoprotein profile designated atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype is characterized by a predominance of small dense LDL particles. Multiple features of this phenotype, including increased levels of triglyceride rich lipoprotein remnants and IDLs, reduced levels of HDL and an association with insulin resistance, contribute to increased risk for coronary heart disease compared with individuals with a predominance of larger LDL. Increased atherogenic potential of small dense LDL is suggested by greater propensity for transport into the subendothelial space, increased binding to arterial proteoglycans, and susceptibility to oxidative modification. Large LDL particles also can be associated with increased coronary disease risk, particularly in the setting of normal or low triglyceride levels. Like small LDL, large LDL exhibits reduced LDL receptor affinity compared with intermediate sized LDL. Future delineation of the determinants of heterogeneity of LDL and other apoB-containing lipoproteins may contribute to improved identification and management of patients at high risk for atherosclerotic disease.
Paper.
Nothing to do with carbs, TAG biosynthesis from carbs, insulin levels in the liver, or temporary storage of carb-derived TAGs.
DeFronzo 1992
Found it.
Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) results from an imbalance between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion. Both longitudinal and cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that the earliest detectable abnormality in NIDDM is an impairment in the body's ability to respond to insulin. Because the pancreas is able to appropriately augment its secretion of insulin to offset the insulin resistance, glucose tolerance remains normal. With time, however, the beta-cell fails to maintain its high rate of insulin secretion and the relative insulinopenia (i.e., relative to the degree of insulin resistance) leads to the development of impaired glucose tolerance and eventually overt diabetes mellitus. The cause of pancreatic "exhaustion" remains unknown but may be related to the effect of glucose toxicity in a genetically predisposed beta-cell. Information concerning the loss of first-phase insulin secretion, altered pulsatility of insulin release, and enhanced proinsulin-insulin secretory ratio is discussed as it pertains to altered beta-cell function in NIDDM. Insulin resistance in NIDDM involves both hepatic and peripheral, muscle, tissues. In the postabsorptive state hepatic glucose output is normal or increased, despite the presence of fasting hyperinsulinemia, whereas the efficiency of tissue glucose uptake is reduced. In response to both endogenously secreted or exogenously administered insulin, hepatic glucose production fails to suppress normally and muscle glucose uptake is diminished. The accelerated rate of hepatic glucose output is due entirely to augmented gluconeogenesis. In muscle many cellular defects in insulin action have been described including impaired insulin-receptor tyrosine kinase activity, diminished glucose transport, and reduced glycogen synthase and pyruvate dehydrogenase. The abnormalities account for disturbances in the two major intracellular pathways of glucose disposal, glycogen synthesis, and glucose oxidation. In the earliest stages of NIDDM, the major defect involves the inability of insulin to promote glucose uptake and storage as glycogen. Other potential mechanisms that have been put forward to explain the insulin resistance, include increased lipid oxidation, altered skeletal muscle capillary density/fiber type/blood flow, impaired insulin transport across the vascular endothelium, increased amylin, calcitonin gene-related peptide levels, and glucose toxicity.
Paper.
Nothing to do with carbs, TAG biosynthesis from carbs, insulin levels in the liver, or temporary storage of carb-derived TAGs.
(I haven't access to this paper online -- I have only the abstract to rely on.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Percy, posted 05-07-2008 8:36 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by Percy, posted 05-08-2008 3:24 PM molbiogirl has replied
 Message 74 by Percy, posted 05-08-2008 4:27 PM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 73 of 451 (465614)
05-08-2008 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Percy
05-08-2008 3:24 PM


Re: Balanced Diets are Bunk
So what you're looking for is citations to research supporting the view that elevated glucose levels encourage the production of triglycerides.
Yes. Taube has no documentation of his claim, then?
Well. If you'd like to look for it, here's the procedure I've been using.
Scholar.google the key terms: glucose, carbohydrates, TAGs, VLDL.
Monkey with the combinations of the terms to see what you get.
Monkey with the publication date (under "Advanced Scholar Google" ... link on upper right). I look for really recent stuff because this is a very active area of research.
See if any of the abstracts look promising.
Find the paper online.
Do a "find" for the terms you're looking for.
See if it's relevant.
I've also had some luck with the key terms: hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome.
I have yet to find a paper that addresses this point directly.
Insulin and their link to TAGs/VLDL, yes.
Glucose and its link to TAGs/VLDL, no.
And I have dedicated several hours of poking around scholar.google looking.
Hey! Sounds like an NIH grant proposal topic. Pity I work on RNA.
...this one, the box at the top shows glucose being converted to fatty acids, which it does not specify are free or bound up in triglycerides...
The arrow to the left points to VLDL. FFAs are converted to TAGs before they are incorporated into the mature VLDL particle.
btw. Don't forget. That is a chart that shows the negative regulation of this metabolic pathway by insulin.
But that cite I posted a couple of days ago re: VLDL and insulin was much clearer, I thought.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Percy, posted 05-08-2008 3:24 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 75 of 451 (465616)
05-08-2008 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by Percy
05-08-2008 2:27 PM


Re: Balanced Diets are Bunk
It would really help keep the discussion on a constructive footing if you could just focus on the topic, and if you could think of us as partners on an adventure of exploration instead of as enemies on opposite sides of a battle line.
Good. You can help by digging around in the book and finding the documentation. As I just posted, I have spent hours on this topic (I find it interesting ... probably why I'm a grad student at 42). Finding an answer to a very specific question like these 2 we are working on is not easy unless someone has addressed that very specific question with a paper, and that doesn't appear that that is the case. I keep digging around in the intros of very closely related papers hoping to stumble on the answer.
If Taubes documented this claim in any way, shape or form, that paper would at least be a jumping off point -- I can data mine the references in his cite.
About your two questions.
I have 3 separate documents filled with cites and quotes so far (which I am saving until we get these 2 questions answered), but none of them are on point re: this question:
The current issue, which is whether blood sugar spikes encourage the production of small, dense LDLs, which play a role in heart disease.
You have to understand, tho.
We can't just jump from glucose to LDL.
We have to take this one tiny metabolic step at a time.
First we have to establish that elevated glucose levels lead to elevated VLDL levels.
Then we have to see if there is a link between these extra VLDL particles and sdLDLs.
Then we have to see if there is a link between sdLDLs and CHD.
I did, however, stumble across a partial answer to this question last night:
The next issue, which is whether it is really true that low carbohydrate diets produce weight loss without hunger and at higher calorie levels than low fat diets, and if so, the mechanisms behind that ability.
The present review summarises the effects of different carbohydrate and fat structures on food intake and appetite and the differences in response at various levels of processing of macronutrients. Several physico-chemical properties of carbohydrate and fat molecules appear to influence the short-term satiating properties.
However, long-term substantiation of these findings expressed in terms of food intake or body weight is not currently available.
Such studies will be required to make clear recommendations regarding dietary composition to aid satiety.
Three major areas associated with fat structure have been investigated with regard to their satiating effectiveness.
Chain length and degree of saturation of fats have a large impact on their physico-chemical properties and several studies have investigated the role of these factors on appetite and eating behaviour.
The final area that has received some attention relates to the functionality of specific fat molecules, particularly conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), mainly in terms of weight regulation and metabolism, but also recently on food intake and appetite.
A number of studies have shown MCT (medium chain length TAGs) to be more satiating than long-chain triacylglycerols in both animals and S24 S. French human subjects (Stubbs & Harbron 1996; Wymelbeke et al. 1998). Furthermore, MCT added to a very-low energy diet have been shown to speed the rate of weight loss and enhance satiety in the first 2 weeks of weight loss (Krotkiewski, 2001).
Within the C18 fatty acids, linoleic acid was found to be more satiating when infused into the upper small intestine in human subjects than oleic or stearic acids (French et al. 2000). Similar findings have been noted when oils are incorporated into foods (Lawton et al. 2000).
These studies have shown that daily intake of CLA (conjugated linoleic acid) can reduce total body fat (Blankson et al. 2000) or abdominal fat (Riserus et al. 2001). In addition, two studies have also shown significant reductions (Medina et al. 2000) or inverse associations (Belury et al. 2003) with circulating leptin levels.
Of these studies, however, only one has attempted to assess appetite effects of CLA in human subjects without significant findings (Medina et al. 2000).
In a recent review (Raben, 2002) of thirty-one short-term studies, fifteen studies demonstrated that low-GI foods reduce hunger or increase satiety, fourteen found no effect and two actually found lower satiety following the low-GI test compared with the high-GI test.
As with many areas of research, a wide variety of methodologies have been employed, making a systematic analysis of the key factors potentially accounting for differences difficult.
Certainly, the physiological profile of low-GI diets (slower gastric emptying, digestion and absorption, lower peak insulin and glucose followed by slower declines and less severe nadirs in glucose levels) would fit with scientific knowledge concerning appetite suppression (Pawlak et al. 2002).
Further well-controlled, appropriately powered, randomised intervention trials are needed to critically address this question (Astrup, 2002).
Effects of dietary fat and carbohydrate on appetite vary depending upon site and structure
British Journal of Nutrition (2004), 92, Suppl. 1, S23-S26
Nothing on "higher caloric levels", tho. Nor on the metabolic pathway or molecular mechanisms.
I haven't looked into it yet. My plate is full with this carb derived TAG thing.
I asked one of my profs today about carb derived TAGs but he didn't know either (re: temporary storage or VLDL particles).
If I can't find anything in the next day or two, I will try to track down a faculty member who works in this area and ask him/her.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by Percy, posted 05-08-2008 2:27 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Percy, posted 05-09-2008 8:53 AM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 76 of 451 (465617)
05-08-2008 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Percy
05-08-2008 4:27 PM


Re: Balanced Diets are Bunk
I think this study is in the general neighborhood of the initial part of the process that Taubes describes, that elevated glucose levels cause increased triglyceride output from the liver: Effects of dietary fructose or glucose on triglyceride production and lipogenic enzyme activities in the liver of Wistar fatty rats, an animal model of NIDDM.
That's funny.
I read that abstract last night.
Unfortunately, I haven't online access before 2002 for this journal, so I can't evaluate the paper.
I will note, however, these are diabetic rats, so it's no surprise there are liopgenic enzyme abnormailities. That is a well-known feature of diabetes.
We need to document normal folks/rats.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Percy, posted 05-08-2008 4:27 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 77 of 451 (465618)
05-08-2008 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Percy
05-08-2008 4:27 PM


Re: Balanced Diets are Bunk
Bingo!
I just tried "lipogenic enzyme" + "glucose" and look what I found.
Transcription of a number of genes involved in lipogenesis is stimulated by dietary carbohydrate in the mammalian liver. Both insulin and increased glucose metabolism have been proposed to be initiating signals for this process, but the pathways by which these effectors act to alter transcription have not been resolved...For many lipogenic enzyme genes, these two factors may provide an integrated signaling system to support the overall nutritional response to dietary carbohydrate.
Glucose and Insulin Function through Two Distinct Transcription Factors to Stimulate Expression of Lipogenic Enzyme Genes in Liver
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 276, Issue 12, 9437-9445, March 23, 2001
Paper.
So the answer is: "We don't know if it's glucose or insulin. And we can't assume one or the other. But we're guessing it's both."
Clearly this aspect of the metabolic pathway isn't worked all the way out. But it is way too earlier to jump the gun and say "Glucose upregulates VLDL production." Way too early.
And insulin has been clearly shown to suppress VLDL, as I documented earlier.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Percy, posted 05-08-2008 4:27 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 78 of 451 (465631)
05-08-2008 7:16 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Percy
05-08-2008 4:27 PM


Re: Balanced Diets are Bunk
I hit the link the second I saw it and I missed this.
This is consistent with Taubes premise, which is that repeatedly abusing the body's metabolic processes with blood sugar spikes causes insulin resistance and obesity, creating an environment where elevated blood sugar levels cause increased triglyceride production by the liver. This is the part that I've been saying is not controversial, and it doesn't appear to be an incredibly rare process as you've been claiming.
Woah, there, Percy. Slow down.
We haven't gotten thru with our first 2 questions.
In order to establish that "blood sugar spikes causes insulin resistance and obesity", we will have to take it step by step, just as we are with glucose and VLDL.
We can't take Taubes at his word. We need to independently establish each and every assumption he is making about metabolic processes.
And, as I pointed out earlier, these are diabetic rats. They in no way support Taubes' assertion (that dietary glucose intake in normal folks leads to insulin resistance/obesity) is "not controversial" and not "an incredibly rare process as (I've) been claiming."
Diabetes is associated with insulin resistance. No question.
Obesity is associated with diabetes. No question.
In order to untangle the question of glucose intake and the development of insulin resistance (or obesity) in perfectly ordinary people with no metabolic defects, we need to crank open a whole new can of worms.
And I know I have enough on my plate as is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Percy, posted 05-08-2008 4:27 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by molbiogirl, posted 05-08-2008 7:30 PM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 79 of 451 (465633)
05-08-2008 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by molbiogirl
05-08-2008 7:16 PM


Insulin resistance
There has been considerable progress over the past few years in unravelling the mechanisms of insulin action, and the molecular defects that give rise to insulin resistance.
Recent advances dissecting the signalling pathways, cellular architecture and spatial compartmentalization of proteins, coupled with the sophisticated genetic analysis of the system, have yielded quantum leaps in our insight into how proteins and tissues interact to control glucose and lipid metabolism.
But many gaps remain in our understanding of these processes, and in the pathophysiology underling insulin resistance.
We need to define the missing steps in the insulin-signalling network, elucidate the mechanisms of cross-talk in the system, and determine the genetic susceptibility of insulin resistance and the interactions between genes and environment.
Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism
Nature 414, 799-806 (13 December 2001)
Despite periods of feeding and fasting, plasma glucose remains in a narrow range between 4 and 7 mM (milli molar) in normal individuals.
This tight control is governed by the balance between glucose absorption from the intestine, production by the liver and uptake and metabolism by peripheral tissues.
Please note that the authors mention how tightly the body regulates glucose metabolism.
Please also note that the glucose-derived TAGs are immediately broken down into FFAs and exported. (This is a normal individual.)
Up to 75% of insulin-dependent glucose disposal occurs in skeletal muscle, whereas adipose tissue accounts for only a small fraction.
Skeletal muscle sucks up the glucose (where it is either used or stored as glycogen). And fat gets only a smidge.
Although insulin does not stimulate glucose uptake in liver, it blocks glycogenolysis (breaking down glycogen) and gluconeogenesis (making glucose), and stimulates glycogen synthesis, thus regulating fasting glucose levels.
Glucose does not enter the liver as the result of dietary glucose intake.
Insulin action in tissues not normally considered insulin sensitive, including brain and pancreatic beta-cell, may also be important in glucose homeostasis
"Not considered insulin sensitive" means nobody thought to look at these tissues before. A whole new set of pathways to look into!
Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism
Nature 414, 799-806 (13 December 2001)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by molbiogirl, posted 05-08-2008 7:16 PM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 81 of 451 (465708)
05-09-2008 12:13 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by Percy
05-09-2008 8:53 AM


Re: Balanced Diets are Bunk
So the big central question is what accounts for this huge disconnect between what it is claimed the research indicates, and the actual experience of the western world.
You know, I didn't mention this before because I didn't want to sidetrack the conversation (again).
But the "western" world does not have the American problem. France, Italy, Greece, remember?
But the mainstream health establishment is claiming that dietary fat is the big bugaboo of modern health. They claim that the research supports a conclusion that dietary fat is the primary culprit behind heart disease, diabetes and obesity.
Pharmaceutical companies, "corporate food", etc. may still be beating that tired old drum, but the mainstream health establishment includes the researchers. And they do not have a consensus re: this issue.
I really wish you would watch Michael Pollan's Google talk. He gives a brief 110 year history of American diet bugaboos. Starting in the late 1800s, an "evil" food is beaten to death by hucksters and a "good" food is flailed mercilessly by the press. That paradigm holds sway for 2 maybe 3 decades, then another takes it's place.
btw. Gravity is not the appropriate analogy. String theory is.
"Food contains calories" is a low level metabolic understanding. "The biochemical pathway to insulin resistance" is a high level metabolic understanding.
I have demonstrated, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that the biochemical pathways responsible for production of carb-derived lipids and insulin resistance are unknown.
And Taubes' book does a great disservice to the American public by suggesting otherwise.
He is no better than the "medical establishment" that you excoriate.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Percy, posted 05-09-2008 8:53 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Percy, posted 05-09-2008 1:31 PM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 85 of 451 (465787)
05-10-2008 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Percy
05-10-2008 7:11 AM


Pollan echos Taubes on another point concerning nutrition as religion.
Taubes is just opening his own branch. A Martin Luther, if you will.
Pollan next agrees with Taubes about the health dilemma, and provides a little information about the "French contradiction" that is consistent with the carbohydrate hypothesis.
The French Paradox doesn't help Taubes.
The obesity and CHD rates for France, Greece and Italy have historically been extraordinarily low.
All 3 countries eat lots of refined carbs.
You gave me the impression that Pollan was going to contradict Taubes.
That wasn't my intention. I just think Pollan has a more nuanced view.
Pollan even traces the origin of our current dilemma back to the 70s, just like Taubes, perhaps back to the same McGovern committee as Taubes.
That's not surprising. I mentioned it as well. The statistical trends are not a secret. But it started in the 50s. It accelerated in the 70s.
Nutrition science in my view is sort of where surgery was in the year 1650.
Which means that Taubes can't have a clue either!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Percy, posted 05-10-2008 7:11 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by Percy, posted 05-10-2008 4:48 PM molbiogirl has replied
 Message 87 by Percy, posted 05-10-2008 5:41 PM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 89 of 451 (465898)
05-11-2008 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by Percy
05-10-2008 4:48 PM


I think examination of scientific issues like this requires objectivity and emotional detachment. If you've got your mind made up already and have only entered into this discussion to take jabs at Taubes at every opportunity then this isn't really a dialogue and there's no point in me responding anymore.
As you wish.
My intent was to track down the specifics of the metabolic pathways Taubes "uses" to make his points.
And, as I suspected, he glosses over some very important gaps in the metabolic pathways.
Until he fills in the gaps (glucose's relationship to the carb-derived TAGs, the mysterious claim that TAGs are temporarily stored in the liver, etc.), his claims are nothing more than speculation.
Reminds me of this cartoon.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Percy, posted 05-10-2008 4:48 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by Percy, posted 05-11-2008 4:28 PM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 91 of 451 (465920)
05-11-2008 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Percy
05-11-2008 4:28 PM


You're driving both me and you crazy jumping with a big "Aha!" on every little detail, and you've been mostly wrong with your citations so far and wasting both our time.
The devil is in the details. And they are worthy of an "Aha."
Without specific metabolites and their relationship to the known metabolic pathways, then Taubes is doing nothing more than speculating.
And I have revealed 3 holes in his "carb = CHD/diabetes II disease link" hypothesis so far.
And to suggest that "further study is warranted" is ... beyond silly. This is a hot topic. Has been for over a decade.
And yet, despite literally hundreds of papers re: carb metabolism and its relationship to disease, no one else (reputable researchers, I mean) is jumping the gun and touting carbs as the new evil nutrient.
Taubes doesn't have any metabolic pathways of his own, he's just trying to present the research, and I've just been trying to present what he presents.
He doesn't present the research. He selectively picks only that research which supports his position and ignores the rest. He also quotemines papers to support his ideas.
You know, I didn't mention it previously ... but I stumbled across an example of this quotemining when you posted those 3 cites that I had such a hard time finding.
The first paper had one sentence that referred to carbs and sdLDLs. One, Percy. The rest of the paper had nothing whatsoever to do with Taubes' hypothesis.
Book'll be here Wednesday.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Percy, posted 05-11-2008 4:28 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Percy, posted 05-11-2008 6:22 PM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 94 of 451 (466004)
05-12-2008 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Percy
05-11-2008 6:22 PM


I have a biochem final tomorrow.
But here's a thought.
Taubes thinks carbs are responsible for type II diabetes.
Diabetes is one of the oldest diseases known to science. It is described in ancient Egyptian writings from 5000 bee as a disease with frequent urination as a primary symptom. In 100 ad a Greek physician, Areteus the Cappadocian, described it as a chronic condition, "the melting down of flesh and limbs into urine," and named the condition diabetes after the Greek word for "siphon" or "going through." Mellitus, the Latin for "sweet," was added because the urine of people with diabetes was sweet. Thus, diabetes became known as diabetes mellitus the "sweet water" disease. In fact, until the 1800s, when the first chemical test for measuring sugar in urine was developed, diabetes was diagnosed by tasting the urine for sweetness when someone was suspected of having diabetes mellitus (Canadian Diabetes Association [CDA], 2006).
Do you think Taubes would agree that the Egyptians and the ancient Greeks had a dietary carb problem?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Percy, posted 05-11-2008 6:22 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 95 of 451 (466005)
05-12-2008 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by Percy
05-11-2008 6:20 PM


Re: Looking for More Country Obesity Data
You're not going to find it on google.
Try "french paradox" on scholar.google.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Percy, posted 05-11-2008 6:20 PM Percy has seen this message but not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2670 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 96 of 451 (466007)
05-12-2008 11:44 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by Percy
05-11-2008 6:20 PM


Re: Looking for More Country Obesity Data
I said historically.
The French and The Greeks have had their obesity rates double in the past few years.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by Percy, posted 05-11-2008 6:20 PM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by Percy, posted 05-12-2008 9:05 PM molbiogirl has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024