Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How does evolution explain the gaps?
Andya Primanda
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 59 (33123)
02-25-2003 2:32 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Jet
02-25-2003 2:10 AM


Tests...
My pick of the species: Homo sapiens.
Test 1: If evolution is true, then the human fossil record should show cumulative changes in some traits, in good correlation with the order of fossil ages.
Result 1: The human (hominid) fossil record which spans from 7 million years ago (MYA) showed some general trends:
Increase in brain volume
Increase in height & body weight
Decrease in prognathism
Test 2: If evolution is true, and modern humans are derived from other species, then Homo sapiens fossils should not be found in older strata than those species assumed to be its ancestors (after considering accidents of preservation and the possibility of ancestor coexisting with descendants).
Result 2: No Homo sapiens fossils are found in rocks dated 2 MYA; instead we find australopithecus fossils. No human fossils of any species (Homo, Australopithecus) are found in 65MYA (Cretaceous) rocks; instead we find shrewlike mammals. No human (or mammal) fossils are found in Devonian rocks; instead we find Acanthostega, Ichtyostega, and other stem-tetrapods.
That's two predictions based on paleontology, and both are confirmed in accordance with evolution by the available facts. Scientific enough for you?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Jet, posted 02-25-2003 2:10 AM Jet has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by David unfamous, posted 02-25-2003 6:06 AM Andya Primanda has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024