You still have not answered the question. Is the Flood event

1. K/T boundary"
2. Lower margin of Cretaceous level?
3. Upper margin of the Cretaceous level?
4. the whole Cretaceous level?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

So all kinds that existed before the flood survived after the flood?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

That is correct. That is incorrect. Science does not deal with truth. But it can often prove something is false.So you cannot know something is true with certainity, but you can certainly prove something is false. Evolution says nothing about Origins. However, science in general can show that the story of Genesis in the Bible is at most an allegory.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Robert.The Genesis story of Creation was shown to be wrong long, long before Dawin published. The TOE simply added additional evidence. But the Genesis myth was falsified long, long ago.But back on the Flood, that too had been falsified long before Evolution was even considered.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Are you perhaps confusing Evolution and the Theory of Evolution?Evolution is simply an account of what happened. It is the sum body of all the evidence. It happened. The evidence is there.The Theory of Evolution though is an attempt to explain the steps, forces and reasons that Evolution happened. So far, over the last 150 years, the TOE has not only withstood every challenge, it has provided a way to make predictions that have later shown to be true.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

So once again, when you are confronted with the error in your posts, your response is to change what you said and pretend it never happened?Originally you said: and once you were shown that Authority was not a valid way of ariving at conclusions you try to reword it to: Then you go on and compound your error by saying: You continue to make the assertion, even after you have been told numerous times that it is simply false, that Evolution deals with more than just the origin of species.One last time.Evolution does not deal with the Origin of Life.Evolution is the body of evidence, nothing more. Just the evidence.The Theory of Evolution is the best explanation yet to explain the body of Evidence.Now, how about your trying to get back on the topic which is:

Fossil Sorting in the Great Flood Part 2

To deal with this, please point to where the evidence of the Great Flood lies in the Geologic Column.Next, please explain the fossil sorting that is seen in all of the layers of the GC, beginning with the pre-Cambrian and working your way upwards.If you can not do that, layer by layer, species by species, then your theory will have been falsified.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

For the first time that I can remember, I actually think I understood everything in your post except...

what did it have to do with anything?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

You say: But you have been told and know that is simply not the case. Evolution is going on today and you havebeen shown examples of it.Biology goes on today and you can see examples of it everytime you cut the grass.Geology is going on today and can be experienced every time you are in an earthquake.These are very much sciences and you know it.Quit trying to claim they are not.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

But that was only coastal and so is no evidence for a world-wide flood of the magnitude described in Genesis.But I don't think anyone would disagree that events such as that lead to many of the flood myths.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Okay, I feel much better now.Didn't understand a word this time.Back to normal.

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Thank you.You have finally agreed that Macroevolution happens.Now let's examine this a little deeper.You are saying that not only does macro evolution (some land animal evolving into dolphin and whales), but that this Macroevolution proceeds at an astounding pace, from land animal into whale in only 6000 years.While evolutionists will agree with you that Macro-evolution happened, land animals evolved into whales, the issue is the speed. The time period you propose is very rapid. In addition, during this whole period there were human observers.How do you explain

1. the lack of first hand observations of the stages of change?
2. the relative scarcity of remains?
3. the fact that we do not see such rapid change continuing?

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

I wanted to put all of this together in one post for future generations. I must admit that your response is extremely enlightening.Originaly RB said. That is pretty simple. Things like cows or something were living on land and after the flood decided to live in the water. Some pretty major changes would be needed, legs became flippers, nostrils moved from the nose to the top of the head and developed flaps to close them off, bodies became streamlined, but pretty much what Evolutionists have said was what happened. But RB is implying speed like no one else.So, I responded. to which RB replied: So for all the Evolutionists here on the board, the wisdom of Rob.Changing from a land mammal into a whale is not Macroevolution. And changes from a land animal into a whale can happen in just generations, less than a hundred years.

You heard it here folk!

​

Nobody saw the cow change into a whale. Why???

​

Because they were slow to leave the Ark, folks".

​

Good grief.

​

---

Aslan is not a Tame Lion