Author
|
Topic: Fossil Sorting in the Great Flood Part 2
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5063 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
Re: science notes
I just got back from a week on Lake Erie. This looks like you wrote it out correctly. Thanks!!
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5063 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 312 of 411 (127335)
07-24-2004 4:00 PM
|
Reply to: Message 311 by jar 07-24-2004 3:55 PM
|
|
Re: science notes
ALSO KNOW that those who permit the publication of the best evolutioarny science (Levin, Lewontin etc) allow from the press things that do not contradict the idea of life from nonlife while THOSE SAME EDITORS think that what we discuss here on evc is "too" philosophical (if I might make a comparison from personal experience)!
This message is a reply to: | | Message 311 by jar, posted 07-24-2004 3:55 PM | | jar has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 313 by jar, posted 07-24-2004 4:04 PM | | Brad McFall has replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5063 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 349 of 411 (128621)
07-29-2004 12:39 PM
|
Reply to: Message 313 by jar 07-24-2004 4:04 PM
|
|
Re: sorting through science, notes...
And that may be because it would be explicitly bringing into our "talk" *nth* of Bertrand Russel PER SORT (*of*) progression WHEN a property of ordinals and mathematical induction change from being independent in Russel's THOUGHT (between the minds of Dedekind and Peano) and exist BEYOND phenomenological thermo but as many still need to catch this rythm I best not continue to try to make the this particular thread head absolutely in acutal infinity relevant as it may not in real trancendentalism be such but first IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO DO SOME READING OF NATURAL THEOLOGY else indeed Georgi's complaint about the negative discussions did remain WHOLELY on the c/e side but I doubt this for reasons I can not but give my very difficult kind of selective speaches. Those hear here whom have misjudged me were only being brought back to those alternatives EVC has already %% discussed. Needless to say the strech from fossil sorting to actual morpholgic renditions of Gladyshev's STRONG INEQUALITIES is not something to be squeezed into the thread's width but might insist instead on something the big ORange was after after all.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 313 by jar, posted 07-24-2004 4:04 PM | | jar has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 350 by jar, posted 07-29-2004 12:48 PM | | Brad McFall has not replied | | Message 351 by mark24, posted 07-29-2004 8:13 PM | | Brad McFall has replied |
|
Brad McFall
Member (Idle past 5063 days) Posts: 3428 From: Ithaca,NY, USA Joined: 12-20-2001
|
|
Message 352 of 411 (128949)
07-30-2004 12:07 PM
|
Reply to: Message 351 by mark24 07-29-2004 8:13 PM
|
|
Re: sorting through science, notes...
I am trying to figure out how to apply statitics to space and time incongruities in Georgi Gladyshev's heirarchic sense and I think I see how to try to PREDICT THEM (an nth series of them) if the morphology THEN exists but this will only have a formal relation to the topic of this thread hence my refernce to "width". I had said I hadn't willed to think futher on CALCIUM sorting and for this I needed to leave this threaded discussion for better color differences. The water remains and from Aggasiz's perspective we would just have been arguing from the wrong from in series. I do however take Georgi MORE seriously so I am sort of in a readable bind I would perfer not to be. Seeing how the old BM thread was not resurrected it probably behooves me not to create all kinds of links to my past postings but if that is what the peanuts gallery wants they can let it be known and that is how i wil right writely latter. Thanks for regerstering a literate protest.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 351 by mark24, posted 07-29-2004 8:13 PM | | mark24 has not replied |
|